Literature DB >> 10900275

Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings.

T F Imperiale1, D R Wagner, C Y Lin, G N Larkin, J D Rogge, D F Ransohoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The clinical significance of a distal colorectal polyp is uncertain. We determined the risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, defined as a polyp with villous features, a polyp with high-grade dysplasia, or cancer, among persons with distal hyperplastic or neoplastic polyps as compared with the risk among persons with no distal polyps. We analyzed data from 1994 consecutive asymptomatic adults (age, 50 years or older) who underwent colonoscopic screening for the first time between September 1995 and December 1998 as part of a program sponsored by an employer. The location and histologic features of all polyps were recorded. Colonoscopy to the level of the cecum was completed in 97.0 percent of the patients.
RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (3.1 percent) had advanced lesions in the distal colon, including 5 with cancer, and 50 (2.5 percent) had advanced proximal lesions, including 7 with cancer. Twenty-three patients with advanced proximal neoplasms (46 percent) had no distal polyps. The prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasia among patients with no distal polyps was 1.5 percent (23 cases among 1564 persons; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 2.1 percent). Among patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, those with distal tubular adenomas, and those with advanced distal polyps, the prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasia was 4.0 percent (8 cases among 201 patients), 7.1 percent (12 cases among 168 patients), and 11.5 percent (7 cases among 61 patients), respectively. The relative risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, adjusted for age and sex, was 2.6 for patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, 4.0 for those with distal tubular adenomas, and 6.7 for those with advanced distal polyps, as compared with patients who had no distal polyps. Older age and male sex were associated with an increased risk of advanced proximal neoplasia (relative risk, 1.3 for every five years of age and 3.3 for male sex).
CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic persons 50 years of age or older who have polyps in the distal colon are more likely to have advanced proximal neoplasia than are persons without distal polyps. However, if colonoscopic screening is performed only in persons with distal polyps, about half the cases of advanced proximal neoplasia will not be detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10900275     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200007203430302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  218 in total

1.  Screening colonoscopy: is it time?

Authors:  J B Simon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Analysis of colorectal cancer screening regimens.

Authors:  R T Clemen; C J Lacke
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2001-12

3.  Are proximal colorectal cancers always associated with distal adenomas?

Authors:  A J M Watson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Recent developments in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Paul Moayyedi; Alex Ford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-14

5.  Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  F Citarda; G Tomaselli; R Capocaccia; S Barcherini; M Crespi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Assessing bowel preparation quality using the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Benjamin Lebwohl; Richard M Rosenberg; Alfred I Neugut; Randi Wolf; Corey H Basch; Jennie Mata; Edwin Hernandez; Douglas A Corley; Steven Shea; Charles E Basch
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.409

7.  The quality of screening colonoscopies in an office-based endoscopy clinic.

Authors:  Douglas Bair; Joe Pham; M Bianca Seaton; Naveen Arya; Michelle Pryce; Trevor L Seaton
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Approach to Incomplete Colonoscopy: New Techniques and Technologies.

Authors:  Diana L Franco; Jonathan A Leighton; Suryakanth R Gurudu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-08

9.  The impact of exclusion criteria on a physician's adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Felippe O Marcondes; Katie M Dean; Robert E Schoen; Daniel A Leffler; Sherri Rose; Michele Morris; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Colorectal neoplasia detection among black and Latino individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristen K Lee; Lina Jandorf; Linda Thélèmaque; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.