Literature DB >> 9585024

Flexible sigmoidoscopy as a mass screening tool.

W S Atkin1.   

Abstract

Endoscopic removal of premalignant adenomas from the distal bowels of the entire population, 3 to 5-yearly from age 50, is advocated in the US as a feasible method of reducing colorectal cancer mortality rates. In the UK, a single flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is regarded as a more cost-effective option. Although more acceptable than colonoscopy, FS and polypectomy are expensive and invasive procedures carrying a small risk of serious harm. We believe that, before implementing mass screening, precise estimates are required of the magnitude of the reduction in mortality and costs (financial, physical and emotional). Several randomized trials, including a large British study, are currently evaluating these aspects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9585024     DOI: 10.1097/00042737-199803000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  7 in total

Review 1.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Endoscopy in screening for digestive cancer.

Authors:  René Lambert
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-12-16

3.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy and the changing distribution of colorectal cancer: implications for screening.

Authors:  K McCallion; R M Mitchell; R H Wilson; F Kee; R G Watson; J S Collins; K R Gardiner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Faecal calprotectin and faecal occult blood tests in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma and adenoma.

Authors:  J Tibble; G Sigthorsson; R Foster; R Sherwood; M Fagerhol; I Bjarnason
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (NORCCAP).

Authors:  G Gondal; T Grotmol; B Hofstad; M Bretthauer; T J Eide; G Hoff
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Screening, prevention and socioeconomic costs associated with the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Redaelli; Carole W Cranor; Gary J Okano; Pat Ray Reese
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Long-lasting reduction of risk of colorectal cancer following screening endoscopy.

Authors:  H Brenner; V Arndt; T Stürmer; C Stegmaier; H Ziegler; G Dhom
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.