Literature DB >> 11149301

Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk people: update of a community-based project.

J A Collett1, J K Olynyk, C F Platell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse results of a screening program for colorectal cancer using flexible sigmoidoscopy.
DESIGN: Survey of results of screening program and follow-up colonoscopies and identification of missed cases from State cancer registry data. PARTICIPANTS: Asymptomatic, average-risk people aged 55-64 years who were either mailed invitations after random selection from the electoral roll or volunteered after hearing about the program.
SETTING: Fremantle Hospital, Western Australia (a public teaching hospital), July 1995 to November 1999 (first 4.5 years of the screening program). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation rates; lesions detected; stage of colorectal cancers diagnosed at the hospital before and after the screening program began (1989-1995 versus 1996-1999); and diagnoses of colorectal cancer in previously screened individuals (from State cancer registry data).
RESULTS: 6446 people were mailed invitations, and 1483 were screened (23% participation rate). Another 1122 people volunteered, giving 2605 people screened overall. Flexible sigmoidoscopy showed adenomatous polyps in 352 people (14%), and colonoscopy was recommended in 399 (15%) on the basis of clinically suspicious lesions. Colonoscopy was performed in 302 (76% participation rate). Screening and follow-up colonoscopy detected 14 colorectal cancers (10 invasive, with eight of these Dukes stage A). One participant was diagnosed with colorectal cancer 12 months after sigmoidoscopy gave normal results. Incidence of colorectal cancer was 119 per 100000 per year, and prevalence was 0.5%. Before the screening program, 12% of cancers diagnosed at our hospital were Dukes stage A, compared with 28% after (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening is an acceptable strategy in asymptomatic, average-risk people which detects colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps. Screening has been associated with a trend to earlier presentation of cancer in our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11149301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  5 in total

1.  Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening examination for colorectal cancer in an outpatient clinic.

Authors:  S Gölder; W Vogt; H Lichti; H C Rath; A Kullmann; J Schölmerich; F Kullmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Is There a Place for Screening Flexible Sigmoidoscopy?

Authors:  Doron Boltin; Yaron Niv
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2012-03

3.  Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (NORCCAP).

Authors:  G Gondal; T Grotmol; B Hofstad; M Bretthauer; T J Eide; G Hoff
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  A comparison of colorectal cancer screening uptake among average-risk insured American Indian/Alaska Native and white women.

Authors:  David G Perdue; Jessica Chubak; Andy Bogart; Denise A Dillard; Eva Marie Garroutte; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2013-08

5.  Reasons for noncompliance with five-yearly screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Charlie Henri Viiala; John Kevin Olynyk
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.