Literature DB >> 12582018

Intention to pursue genetic testing for breast cancer among women due for screening mammography.

Karin Gwyn1, Sally W Vernon, Patrick M Conoley.   

Abstract

Because few studies have addressed the intention to pursue testing for breast cancer susceptibility among women in the general population, we examined whether women due for routine mammography would want such testing and what factors might impact on their decision to pursue testing. A questionnaire was mailed to women > or =50 years of age who had undergone a screening mammogram 12 to 14 months before the study. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with intention to pursue genetic testing. Approximately 41% of respondents probably or definitely intended to pursue testing. In univariate analysis, the intention to undergo testing was not significantly associated with age, education, marital status, potential effects on health or life insurance, or physician recommendation. Although significant in univariate analysis, family history of breast cancer and ethnicity were not significant in multivariable analysis. In both univariate and multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with intention to undergo testing included awareness of genetic testing, cancer worry, and insurance coverage of testing cost. Intention also was associated with the respondent wanting to know whether she possessed the susceptibility gene, even if that knowledge would not impact on options for early detection or treatment. Given the relatively high level of interest in testing among women at average risk of breast cancer, these results may help health care professionals educate and counsel women regarding the appropriate use of genetic testing as well as breast cancer risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12582018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  16 in total

Review 1.  Cancers related to genetic mutations: important psychosocial issues for Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John Robinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Use of a patient-entered family health history tool with decision support in primary care: impact of identification of increased risk patients on genetic counseling attendance.

Authors:  Adam H Buchanan; Carol A Christianson; Tiffany Himmel; Karen P Powell; Astrid Agbaje; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Vincent C Henrich; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Linking genetic counseling content to short-term outcomes in individuals at elevated breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Lee Ellington; Nancy Schoenberg; Parul Agarwal; Thomas Jackson; Stephanie Dickinson; Jame Abraham; Electra D Paskett; Howard Leventhal; Michael Andrykowski
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The decision to test in women receiving genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Kimberly Kelly; Howard Leventhal; Michael Andrykowski; Deborah Toppmeyer; Judie Much; James Dermody; Monica Marvin; Jill Baran; Marvin Schwalb
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Breast cancer genetic testing awareness, attitudes and intentions of Latinas living along the US-Mexico border: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Patricia Chalela; José A Pagán; Dejun Su; Edgar Muñoz; Amelie G Ramirez
Journal:  J Community Med Health Educ       Date:  2012

7.  Efficacy of the health belief model for predicting intention to pursue genetic testing for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Amanda Cyr; Tim Allen Dunnagan; George Haynes
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Guidelines for genetic risk assessment of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: early disagreements and low utilization.

Authors:  Douglas E Levy; Judy E Garber; Alexandra E Shields
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Promotion of cancer family history awareness: Jameslink Cancer Risk Assessment Tool at community health fairs.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Kyle Porter; Amber Remy; Judith A Westman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Adult daughters' reports of breast cancer risk reduction and early detection advice received from their mothers: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Pamela S Sinicrope; Christi A Patten; Lara P Clark; Tabetha A Brockman; Emily E Rock; Marlene H Frost; Larra R Petersen; Robert A Vierkant; Celine M Vachon; Zachary S Fredericksen; Carol A Janney; Thomas A Sellers; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.