OBJECTIVE: Awareness of cancer family history is dependent upon communication between family members. Communication of this information and related decision-making could be important factors influencing breast cancer risk reduction and early detection behaviors. Using survey data from 2328 women (mean age 62.5 years) from 372 families enrolled in the Minnesota breast cancer family study, we explored adult daughter's reports of breast cancer risk reduction advice received from their mothers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Approximately 212 (9%) of respondents reported receiving breast cancer risk reduction advice from their mothers and 130 (89%) reported acting upon such advice. Having a mother or first degree relative (FDR) with a history of breast cancer was significantly correlated with following advice to a higher degree as compared with those not having such family history (p=0.003). Most frequently reported types of advice were to have mammograms (36%) and to have clinical breast exams (35%). Using multivariable logistic regression and after accounting for non-independence of the sample, significant independent correlates of receiving advice included younger age, having an affected mother, and having a higher perceived breast cancer risk. Receiving advice was also correlated with engaging in a higher number of health promoting behaviors and ever having received a mammogram. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings are consistent with social influence theory and suggest that mother-daughter communication about reducing risk, especially among those having a FDR with breast cancer, could be a potential pathway through which breast cancer family history is associated with the adoption of breast cancer screening and risk reduction behaviors. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: Awareness of cancer family history is dependent upon communication between family members. Communication of this information and related decision-making could be important factors influencing breast cancer risk reduction and early detection behaviors. Using survey data from 2328 women (mean age 62.5 years) from 372 families enrolled in the Minnesota breast cancer family study, we explored adult daughter's reports of breast cancer risk reduction advice received from their mothers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Approximately 212 (9%) of respondents reported receiving breast cancer risk reduction advice from their mothers and 130 (89%) reported acting upon such advice. Having a mother or first degree relative (FDR) with a history of breast cancer was significantly correlated with following advice to a higher degree as compared with those not having such family history (p=0.003). Most frequently reported types of advice were to have mammograms (36%) and to have clinical breast exams (35%). Using multivariable logistic regression and after accounting for non-independence of the sample, significant independent correlates of receiving advice included younger age, having an affected mother, and having a higher perceived breast cancer risk. Receiving advice was also correlated with engaging in a higher number of health promoting behaviors and ever having received a mammogram. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings are consistent with social influence theory and suggest that mother-daughter communication about reducing risk, especially among those having a FDR with breast cancer, could be a potential pathway through which breast cancer family history is associated with the adoption of breast cancer screening and risk reduction behaviors. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Iris van Oostrom; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Annette H J T Bröcker-Vriends; Christi J van Asperen; Rolf H Sijmons; Caroline Seynaeve; Arthur R Van Gool; Jan G M Klijn; Aad Tibben Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2006-07-26
Authors: Lisa Madlensky; Robert A Vierkant; Celine M Vachon; V Shane Pankratz; James R Cerhan; Susan Thomas Vadaparampil; Thomas A Sellers Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Anne L Ersig; Allison Werner-Lin; Lindsey Hoskins; Jennifer Young; Jennifer T Loud; June Peters; Mark H Greene Journal: J Fam Nurs Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 3.818
Authors: Kaleea Lewis; Shibani Kulkarni; Swann Arp Adams; Heather M Brandt; Jamie R Lead; John R Ureda; Delores Fedrick; Chris Mathews; Daniela B Friedman Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Kevin Wright; Carla Fisher; Camella Rising; Amelia Burke-Garcia; Dasha Afanaseva; Xiaomei Cai Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Claire E Wright; Michelle Harvie; Anthony Howell; D Gareth Evans; Nick Hulbert-Williams; Louise S Donnelly Journal: Hered Cancer Clin Pract Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 2.857