Literature DB >> 12560279

Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey.

Peter Bower1, Martin Roland, John Campbell, Nicola Mead.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine patients' views on access and continuity in general practice to derive quality standards.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from general practice research studies and routine quality assessment activities undertaken by practices and primary care trusts.
SETTING: General practice. PARTICIPANTS: General practice patients.
RESULTS: Satisfactory standards of access were next day appointments with general practitioners and a 6-10 minute wait for consultations to begin. A satisfactory level of continuity was seeing the same general practitioner "a lot of the time." Standards varied with the analytic method used and by sociodemographic group.
CONCLUSIONS: Standards expected by patients in primary care can be derived from linked report-assessment pairs. Patients may have expectations of access that are in excess of government targets. Patients also have high expectations of continuity of care. It is unclear the degree to which such standards are reliable or valid, how conflicts between access and continuity should be resolved, or how these standards relate to other priorities of patients such as high quality interpersonal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12560279      PMCID: PMC140766          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7383.258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  16 in total

1.  Towards a global definition of patient centred care.

Authors:  M Stewart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-24

2.  Consumer and professional standards: working towards consensus.

Authors:  C Williamson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-09

3.  The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties.

Authors:  J Ramsay; J L Campbell; S Schroter; J Green; M Roland
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  What does 'access to health care' mean?

Authors:  Martin Gulliford; Jose Figueroa-Munoz; Myfanwy Morgan; David Hughes; Barry Gibson; Roger Beech; Meryl Hudson
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2002-07

5.  Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations.

Authors:  P Little; H Everitt; I Williamson; G Warner; M Moore; C Gould; K Ferrier; S Payne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-20

6.  An exploration of the value of the personal doctor-patient relationship in general practice.

Authors:  K E Kearley; G K Freeman; A Heath
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients' assessments of primary health care.

Authors:  J L Campbell; J Ramsay; J Green
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-06

8.  Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study.

Authors:  S M Campbell; M Hann; J Hacker; C Burns; D Oliver; A Thapar; N Mead; D G Safran; M O Roland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

9.  Questionnaire survey of users of NHS walk-in centres: observational study.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; Terjinder Manku-Cott; Laurence Moore; Melanie Chalder; Deborah Sharp
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 10.  A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain.

Authors:  M Wensing; H P Jung; J Mainz; F Olesen; R Grol
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  39 in total

1.  Evaluation of advanced access in the national primary care collaborative.

Authors:  Mark Pickin; Alicia O'Cathain; Fiona C Sampson; Simon Dixon
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Future of primary healthcare education: current problems and potential solutions.

Authors:  J Lord
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Competition in general practice.

Authors:  Martin Marshall; Tim Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-11-19

4.  Article missed published papers on GPAQ validity.

Authors:  Martin Roland; Peter Bower; Nicki Mead
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  GPAQ.

Authors:  Matthew Hankins; Helen Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Why we don't come: patient perceptions on no-shows.

Authors:  Naomi L Lacy; Audrey Paulman; Matthew D Reuter; Bruce Lovejoy
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Cheryl A Moyer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patient age influences perceptions about health care communication.

Authors:  Jennifer E DeVoe; Lorraine S Wallace; George E Fryer
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 9.  The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions.

Authors:  Dionne S Kringos; Wienke G W Boerma; Allen Hutchinson; Jouke van der Zee; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristics.

Authors:  John Campbell; Patten Smith; Sonja Nissen; Peter Bower; Marc Elliott; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.