Literature DB >> 9823053

A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain.

M Wensing1, H P Jung, J Mainz, F Olesen, R Grol.   

Abstract

To make health care more responsive to patient needs, insight into patient priorities is needed. A systematic literature review, using electronic and manual searches, was made of studies on patient priorities with regard to primary health care. Data-extraction was performed by two researchers, followed by systematic analyses of study features. 57 studies were included. The aspects of care and methods used showed a wide variation. Aspects most often included were "informativeness", "humaneness" and "competence/accuracy". Based on an analysis of 19 studies, the following aspects were seen by patients as most important in more than 50% of the studies that included them: "humaneness", "competence/accuracy", "patients' involvement in decisions", "time for care", "other aspects of availability/accessibility", "informativeness", "exploring patients' needs", "other aspects of relation and communication" and "availability of special services".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9823053     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00222-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  111 in total

1.  James MacKenzie lecture 1998. Quality and efficiency: enemies or partners?

Authors:  M Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.

Authors:  S M Campbell; J Braspenning; A Hutchinson; M Marshall
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

3.  Comparison of patients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care.

Authors:  H P Jung; M Wensing; F Olesen; R Grol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

4.  Experiences of non-UK-qualified doctors working within the UK regulatory framework: a qualitative study.

Authors:  A Slowther; G A Lewando Hundt; J Purkis; R Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Patients' views of the good doctor.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-09-28

6.  Does advanced access work for patients and practices?

Authors:  Chris Salisbury
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Burnout and empathy in primary care: three hypotheses.

Authors:  Franck Zenasni; Emilie Boujut; Aude Woerner; Serge Sultan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  What do patients and the public want from primary care?

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-11-19

9.  The quality and outcomes framework of the GMS contract: a quiet evolution for 2006.

Authors:  Helen Lester; Deborah J Sharp; F Dr Hobbs; Mayur Lakhani
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  How do stakeholder groups vary in a Delphi technique about primary mental health care and what factors influence their ratings?

Authors:  S M Campbell; T Shield; A Rogers; L Gask
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.