Literature DB >> 11389317

Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients' assessments of primary health care.

J L Campbell1, J Ramsay, J Green.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients' evaluations are an important means of measuring aspects of primary care quality such as communication and interpersonal care. This study aims to examine variations in assessments of primary care according to age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnicity variables.
METHODS: A cross sectional survey of consecutive patients attending 55 inner London practices was performed over a 2 week period using the General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS) instrument which assesses 13 important dimensions of primary care provision. Variations in scale scores were investigated for differences relating to age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic status as reported by respondents.
RESULTS: A total of 7692 questionnaires were returned (71% response rate). Valid information on age, gender, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity was available for 4819 out of 5496 adult respondents. Approximately half the respondents reported their ethnic group as "white" and most of the remaining respondents reported belonging to "black" or South Asian groups. Significant differences existed between groups of patients defined by age or ethnicity for most of the scale scores examined. Black, South Asian, and Chinese respondents reported lower scores (representing less favourable assessments) than white respondents; older respondents reported more favourable evaluations of care than younger respondents; and less affluent groups reported lower scores than more affluent groups for two of the 13 dimensions. There was no significant difference between gender groups with respect to assessment of primary care. Age and ethnicity were independent predictors of respondents' assessments of primary care.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist between identifiable subgroups of the population in their assessments of primary health care measured using the GPAS instrument. This work adds to the literature on variation in healthcare experience and the potential for patient assessment of primary care. Further work is required to investigate these differences in more detail and to relate them to differences in the nature and process of primary care provision. Primary care providers need to ensure that services provided are appropriate for all patient groups within their communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11389317      PMCID: PMC1757978          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.10.2.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  20 in total

1.  Inequalities in mortality and illness in Trent NHS Region.

Authors:  N Huff; C Macleod; D Ebdon; D Phillips; L Davies; A Nicholson
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1999-03

2.  The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties.

Authors:  J Ramsay; J L Campbell; S Schroter; J Green; M Roland
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature.

Authors:  J A Hall; M C Dornan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Intercultural consultations: investigation of factors that deter non-English speaking women from attending their general practitioners for cervical screening.

Authors:  J Naish; J Brown; B Denton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-29

5.  Lay evaluation of medical treatment and competence development of a model of the function of the physician's affective behavior.

Authors:  Z Ben-Sira
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Gender differences in minor morbidity among full time employees of a British university.

Authors:  C Emslie; K Hunt; S Macintyre
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 7.  Patient decision making. The missing ingredient in compliance research.

Authors:  J L Donovan
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Physician's interviewing styles and medical information obtained from patients.

Authors:  D L Roter; J A Hall
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Key determinants of consumer satisfaction with general practice.

Authors:  S J Williams; M Calnan
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  Patients' views of priority setting in health care: an interview survey in one practice.

Authors:  A Dicker; D Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-28
View more
  93 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction of female and male users of Veterans Health Administration services.

Authors:  Steven M Wright; Thomas Craig; Stacey Campbell; Jim Schaefer; Charles Humble
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Young age predicts poor antiretroviral adherence and viral load suppression among injection drug users.

Authors:  Scott E Hadland; M-J Milloy; Thomas Kerr; Ruth Zhang; Silvia Guillemi; Robert S Hogg; Julio S Montaner; Evan Wood
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.078

3.  Transcultural communication and ethnic comparisons in the experience of services.

Authors:  Caroline Free
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Communication between South Asian patients and GPs: comparative study using the Roter Interactional Analysis System.

Authors:  Richard D Neal; Nasreen Ali; Karl Atkin; Victoria L Allgar; Shahid Ali; Tim Coleman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Mala Rao; Aileen Clarke; Colin Sanderson; Richard Hammersley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-22

6.  Capturing users' experience of UK out-of-hours primary medical care: piloting and psychometric properties of the Out-of-hours Patient Questionnaire.

Authors:  J L Campbell; A Dickens; S H Richards; P Pound; M Greco; P Bower
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-12

7.  Article missed published papers on GPAQ validity.

Authors:  Martin Roland; Peter Bower; Nicki Mead
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  GPAQ.

Authors:  Matthew Hankins; Helen Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Quality gap of educational services in viewpoints of students in Hormozgan University of medical sciences.

Authors:  Teamur Aghamolaei; Shahram Zare
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Patients' experience and satisfaction in primary care: secondary analysis using multilevel modelling.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; Marc Wallace; Alan A Montgomery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.