Literature DB >> 11593831

An exploration of the value of the personal doctor-patient relationship in general practice.

K E Kearley1, G K Freeman, A Heath.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Within the context of general practice, continuity of care creates an opportunity for a personal doctor-patient relationship to develop which has been associated with significant benefits for patients and general practitioners (GPs). Continuity of care is, however, threatened by trends in the organisational development of primary health care in the United Kingdom and its intrinsic role within general practice is currently the subject of debate. AIMS: To determine how many patients report having a personal doctor and when this is most valued, to compare the value of a personal doctor-patient relationship with that of convenience, and to relate these findings to a range of patient, GP, and practice variables. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross sectional postal questionnaire study.
SETTING: Nine hundred and ninety-six randomly selected adult patients from a stratified random sample of 18 practices and 284 GP principals in Oxfordshire.
METHOD: Qualitative interviews with patients and GPs were conducted and used to derive a parallel patient and GP questionnaire. Each patient (100 from each practice) was invited to complete a questionnaire to evaluate their experience and views concerning personal care. All GP principals currently practising in Oxfordshire were sent a similar questionnaire, which also included demographic variables.
RESULTS: Overall, 75% of patients reported having at least one personal GP. The number of patients reporting a personal GP in each practice varied from 53% to 92%. Having a personal doctor-patient relationship was highly valued by patients and GPs, in particular for more serious, psychological and family issues when 77-88% of patients and 80-98% of GPs valued a personal relationship more than a convenient appointment. For minor illness it had much less value.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients and GPs particularly value a personal doctor-patient relationship for more serious or for psychological problems. Whether a patient has a personal GP is associated with their perception of its importance and with factors which create an opportunity for a relationship to evolve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11593831      PMCID: PMC1314098     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  18 in total

1.  General practice--time for a new definition.

Authors:  F Olesen; J Dickinson; P Hjortdahl
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-05

2.  Fix what's wrong, not what's right, with general practice in Britain.

Authors:  J De Maeseneer; P Hjortdahl; B Starfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-17

3.  Does continuity in general practice really matter?

Authors:  B Guthrie; S Wyke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

4.  Evidence and primary care.

Authors:  R Horton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Decision-making: a comparison of referral practice and primary care.

Authors:  H C Sox
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Is primary care essential?

Authors:  B Starfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-10-22       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Z Di Blasi; E Harkness; E Ernst; A Georgiou; J Kleijnen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-03-10       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Continuity of care: general practitioners' knowledge about, and sense of responsibility toward their patients.

Authors:  P Hjortdahl
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  J G Howie; D J Heaney; M Maxwell; J J Walker; G K Freeman; H Rai
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

10.  The influence of general practitioners' knowledge about their patients on the clinical decision-making process.

Authors:  P Hjortdahl
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.581

View more
  69 in total

1.  Continuity of care--going out of style?

Authors:  P Hjortdahl
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Walk-in centres in primary care: a review of the international literature.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; James Munro
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Does advanced access work for patients and practices?

Authors:  Chris Salisbury
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Open-access versus bookable appointment systems: survey of patients attending appointments with general practitioners.

Authors:  Shane W Pascoe; Richard D Neal; Victoria L Allgar
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Evaluation of advanced access in the national primary care collaborative.

Authors:  Mark Pickin; Alicia O'Cathain; Fiona C Sampson; Simon Dixon
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Correlates of a "do not hospitalize" designation: in a sample of frail nursing home residents in Vancouver.

Authors:  Margaret McGregor; Dan Pare; Areta Wong; Michelle B Cox; Penny Brasher
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  The medical care practitioner: Newspeak and the duping of the public.

Authors:  Iona Heath
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Creating an integrated health care system in Greece: a primary care perspective.

Authors:  K Souliotis; C Lionis
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Making general practice fit for the 21st century.

Authors:  David Jewell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  GPs' attitudes to personal continuity: findings from everyday practice differ from postal surveys.

Authors:  Henk Schers; Hans Bor; Wil van den Bosch; Richard Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.