Literature DB >> 12558298

Measuring hearing in the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina): comparison of behavioral and auditory brainstem response techniques.

Lawrence F Wolski1, Rindy C Anderson, Ann E Bowles, Pamela K Yochem.   

Abstract

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and standard behavioral methods were compared by measuring in-air audiograms for an adult female harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). Behavioral audiograms were obtained using two techniques: the method of constant stimuli and the staircase method. Sensitivity was tested from 0.250 to 30 kHz. The seal showed good sensitivity from 6 to 12 kHz [best sensitivity 8.1 dB (re 20 microPa2 x s) RMS at 8 kHz]. The staircase method yielded thresholds that were lower by 10 dB on average than the method of constant stimuli. ABRs were recorded at 2, 4, 8, 16, and 22 kHz and showed a similar best range (8-16 kHz). ABR thresholds averaged 5.7 dB higher than behavioral thresholds at 2, 4, and 8 kHz. ABRs were at least 7 dB lower at 16 kHz, and approximately 3 dB higher at 22 kHz. The better sensitivity of ABRs at higher frequencies could have reflected differences in the seal's behavior during ABR testing and/or bandwidth characteristics of test stimuli. These results agree with comparisons of ABR and behavioral methods performed in other recent studies and indicate that ABR methods represent a good alternative for estimating hearing range and sensitivity in pinnipeds, particularly when time is a critical factor and animals are untrained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12558298     DOI: 10.1121/1.1527961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Kohei Kawamoto; Yehoash Raphael; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A comparison of auditory brainstem responses across diving bird species.

Authors:  Sara E Crowell; Alicia M Wells-Berlin; Catherine E Carr; Glenn H Olsen; Ronald E Therrien; Sally E Yannuzzi; Darlene R Ketten
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  In-air hearing of a diving duck: A comparison of psychoacoustic and auditory brainstem response thresholds.

Authors:  Sara E Crowell; Alicia M Wells-Berlin; Ronald E Therrien; Sally E Yannuzzi; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Objective threshold estimation and measurement of the residual background noise in auditory evoked potentials of goldfish.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xiao; Christopher B Braun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparative assessment of amphibious hearing in pinnipeds.

Authors:  Colleen Reichmuth; Marla M Holt; Jason Mulsow; Jillian M Sills; Brandon L Southall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  In-air evoked potential audiometry of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) from the North and Baltic Seas.

Authors:  Andreas Ruser; Michael Dähne; Janne Sundermeyer; Klaus Lucke; Dorian S Houser; James J Finneran; Jörg Driver; Iwona Pawliczka; Tanja Rosenberger; Ursula Siebert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Aerial low-frequency hearing in captive and free-ranging harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) measured using auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Klaus Lucke; Gordon D Hastie; Kerstin Ternes; Bernie McConnell; Simon Moss; Deborah J F Russell; Heike Weber; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  In-air hearing of the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo).

Authors:  Alyssa Maxwell; Kirstin Anderson Hansen; Sara Torres Ortiz; Ole Næsbye Larsen; Ursula Siebert; Magnus Wahlberg
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 2.422

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.