Literature DB >> 23563644

Comparative assessment of amphibious hearing in pinnipeds.

Colleen Reichmuth1, Marla M Holt, Jason Mulsow, Jillian M Sills, Brandon L Southall.   

Abstract

Auditory sensitivity in pinnipeds is influenced by the need to balance efficient sound detection in two vastly different physical environments. Previous comparisons between aerial and underwater hearing capabilities have considered media-dependent differences relative to auditory anatomy, acoustic communication, ecology, and amphibious life history. New data for several species, including recently published audiograms and previously unreported measurements obtained in quiet conditions, necessitate a re-evaluation of amphibious hearing in pinnipeds. Several findings related to underwater hearing are consistent with earlier assessments, including an expanded frequency range of best hearing in true seals that spans at least six octaves. The most notable new results indicate markedly better aerial sensitivity in two seals (Phoca vitulina and Mirounga angustirostris) and one sea lion (Zalophus californianus), likely attributable to improved ambient noise control in test enclosures. An updated comparative analysis alters conventional views and demonstrates that these amphibious pinnipeds have not necessarily sacrificed aerial hearing capabilities in favor of enhanced underwater sound reception. Despite possessing underwater hearing that is nearly as sensitive as fully aquatic cetaceans and sirenians, many seals and sea lions have retained acute aerial hearing capabilities rivaling those of terrestrial carnivores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23563644     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-013-0813-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  32 in total

1.  The staircrase-method in psychophysics.

Authors:  T N CORNSWEET
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1962-09

2.  Low false-alarm rates in signal detection by marine mammals.

Authors:  R J Schusterman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: where is the "missing 6 dB"?

Authors:  M C Killion
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Psychophysical and electrophysiological aerial audiograms of a Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus).

Authors:  Jason Mulsow; Colleen Reichmuth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Underwater psychophysical audiogram of a young male California sea lion (Zalophus californianus).

Authors:  Jason Mulsow; Dorian S Houser; James J Finneran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Masking in three pinnipeds: underwater, low-frequency critical ratios.

Authors:  B L Southall; R J Schusterman; D Kastak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Low-frequency acoustic pressure, velocity, and intensity thresholds in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and white whale (Delphinapterus leucas).

Authors:  James J Finneran; Donald A Carder; Sam H Ridgway
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory masking in three pinnipeds: aerial critical ratios and direct critical bandwidth measurements.

Authors:  Brandon L Southall; Ronald J Schusterman; David Kastak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Underwater audiogram of the California sea lion by the conditioned vocalization technique.

Authors:  R J Schusterman; R F Balliet; J Nixon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Foraging behavior and success of a mesopelagic predator in the northeast Pacific Ocean: insights from a data-rich species, the northern elephant seal.

Authors:  Patrick W Robinson; Daniel P Costa; Daniel E Crocker; Juan Pablo Gallo-Reynoso; Cory D Champagne; Melinda A Fowler; Chandra Goetsch; Kimberly T Goetz; Jason L Hassrick; Luis A Hückstädt; Carey E Kuhn; Jennifer L Maresh; Sara M Maxwell; Birgitte I McDonald; Sarah H Peterson; Samantha E Simmons; Nicole M Teutschel; Stella Villegas-Amtmann; Ken Yoda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) can detect auditory cues while diving.

Authors:  Kirstin Anderson Hansen; Alyssa Maxwell; Ursula Siebert; Ole Næsbye Larsen; Magnus Wahlberg
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-05-05

2.  Amphibious auditory evoked potentials in four North American Testudines genera spanning the aquatic-terrestrial spectrum.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Zeyl; Carol E Johnston
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The better to eat you with: the comparative feeding morphology of phocid seals (Pinnipedia, Phocidae).

Authors:  Sarah S Kienle; Annalisa Berta
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Hearing in the sea otter (Enhydra lutris): auditory profiles for an amphibious marine carnivore.

Authors:  Asila Ghoul; Colleen Reichmuth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  In-air evoked potential audiometry of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) from the North and Baltic Seas.

Authors:  Andreas Ruser; Michael Dähne; Janne Sundermeyer; Klaus Lucke; Dorian S Houser; James J Finneran; Jörg Driver; Iwona Pawliczka; Tanja Rosenberger; Ursula Siebert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Shining new light on sensory brain activation and physiological measurement in seals using wearable optical technology.

Authors:  J Chris McKnight; Alexander Ruesch; Kimberley Bennett; Mathijs Bronkhorst; Steve Balfour; Simon E W Moss; Ryan Milne; Peter L Tyack; Jana M Kainerstorfer; Gordon D Hastie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 6.671

7.  Characteristics and Propagation of Airgun Pulses in Shallow Water with Implications for Effects on Small Marine Mammals.

Authors:  Line Hermannsen; Jakob Tougaard; Kristian Beedholm; Jacob Nabe-Nielsen; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The evolutionary biology of musical rhythm: was Darwin wrong?

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Environmental predictors of ice seal presence in the Bering Sea.

Authors:  Jennifer L Miksis-Olds; Laura E Madden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  In-air hearing in Hawaiian monk seals: implications for understanding the auditory biology of Monachinae seals.

Authors:  Brandi Ruscher; Jillian M Sills; Beau P Richter; Colleen Reichmuth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.