Literature DB >> 12549672

Current trends in lead discovery: are we looking for the appropriate properties?

Tudor I Oprea1.   

Abstract

The new drug discovery paradigm is based on high-throughput technologies, both with respect to synthesis and screening. The progression HTS hits --> lead series --> candidate drug --> marketed drug appears to indicate that the probability of reaching launched status is one in a million. This has shifted the focus from good quality candidate drugs to good quality leads. We examined the current trends in lead discovery by comparing MW (molecular weight), LogP (octanol/water partition coefficient, estimated by Kowwin) and LogSw (intrinsic water solubility, estimated by Wskowwin) for the following categories: 62 leads and 75 drugs; compounds in the development phase (I, II, III and launched), as indexed in MDDR; and compounds indexed in medicinal chemistry journals, categorized according to their biological activity. Comparing the distribution of the above properties, the 62 lead structures show the lowest median with respect to MW (smaller) and LogP (less hydrophobic), and the highest median with respect to LogSw (more soluble). By contrast, over 50% of the medicinal chemistry compounds with activities above 1 nanomolar have MW > 425, LogP > 4.25 and LogSw < -4.75, indicating that the reported active compounds are larger, more hydrophobic and lesssoluble when compared to time-tested quality leads. In the MDDR set, a progressive constraint to reduce MW and LogP, and to increase LogSw, can be observed when examining trends in the developmental sequence: phase I, II, III and launched drugs. These trends indicate that other properties besides binding affinity, e.g., solubility and hydrophobicity, need to be considered when choosing the appropriate leads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12549672     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021368007777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Divers        ISSN: 1381-1991            Impact factor:   2.943


  13 in total

1.  Parallel personal comments on "classical" papers in combinatorial chemistry.

Authors:  M Lebl
Journal:  J Comb Chem       Date:  1999-01

2.  The Design of Leadlike Combinatorial Libraries.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  1999-12-16       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  D F Horrobin
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Cheminformatics: a tool for decision-makers in drug discovery.

Authors:  T Olsson; T I Oprea
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2001-05

5.  Is there a difference between leads and drugs? A historical perspective.

Authors:  T I Oprea; A M Davis; S J Teague; P D Leeson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

6.  Diverse viewpoints on computational aspects of molecular diversity.

Authors:  Y C Martin
Journal:  J Comb Chem       Date:  2001 May-Jun

Review 7.  Chemical space navigation in lead discovery.

Authors:  Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  High Throughput Screening for Drug Discovery: Continually Transitioning into New Technology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  1999

9.  Serendipity and structured research in drug discovery.

Authors:  G de Stevens
Journal:  Prog Drug Res       Date:  1986

10.  Atom/fragment contribution method for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients.

Authors:  W M Meylan; P H Howard
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.534

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Hierarchical docking of databases of multiple ligand conformations.

Authors:  David M Lorber; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Comprehensive mechanistic analysis of hits from high-throughput and docking screens against beta-lactamase.

Authors:  Kerim Babaoglu; Anton Simeonov; John J Irwin; Michael E Nelson; Brian Feng; Craig J Thomas; Laura Cancian; M Paola Costi; David A Maltby; Ajit Jadhav; James Inglese; Christopher P Austin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  On a biophysical and mathematical model of Pgp-mediated multidrug resistance: understanding the "space-time" dimension of MDR.

Authors:  Vasiliki Panagiotopoulou; Giles Richardson; Oliver E Jensen; Cyril Rauch
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Comparative virtual screening and novelty detection for NMDA-GlycineB antagonists.

Authors:  Bjoern A Krueger; Tanja Weil; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Inhibition of protein-protein interactions with low molecular weight compounds.

Authors:  Marilyn M Matthews; David J Weber; Paul S Shapiro; Andrew Coop; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  Curr Trends Med Chem       Date:  2008-01-01

7.  Drug discovery: nature's pieces.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 24.427

8.  Structure-based optimization of a non-beta-lactam lead results in inhibitors that do not up-regulate beta-lactamase expression in cell culture.

Authors:  Donatella Tondi; Federica Morandi; Richard Bonnet; M Paola Costi; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Design and in vitro activities of N-alkyl-N-[(8-R-2,2-dimethyl-2H-chromen-6-yl)methyl]heteroarylsulfonamides, novel, small-molecule hypoxia inducible factor-1 pathway inhibitors and anticancer agents.

Authors:  Jiyoung Mun; Adnan Abdul Jabbar; Narra Sarojini Devi; Shaoman Yin; Yingzhe Wang; Chalet Tan; Deborah Culver; James P Snyder; Erwin G Van Meir; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 10.  Hydrophobicity--shake flasks, protein folding and drug discovery.

Authors:  Aurijit Sarkar; Glen E Kellogg
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.