Literature DB >> 16101414

Hierarchical docking of databases of multiple ligand conformations.

David M Lorber1, Brian K Shoichet.   

Abstract

Ligand flexibility is an important problem in molecular docking and virtual screening. To address this challenge, we investigate a hierarchical pre-organization of multiple conformations of small molecules. Such organization of pre-calculated conformations removes the exploration of ligand conformational space from the docking calculation and allows for concise representation of what can be thousands of conformations. The hierarchy also recognizes and prunes incompatible conformations early in the calculation, eliminating redundant calculations of fit. We investigate the method by docking the MDL Drug Data Report (MDDR), an annotated database of 100,000 molecules, into apo and holo forms of seven unrelated targets. This annotated database allows us to track the ranking of tens to hundreds of annotated ligands in each of the docking systems. The binding sites and database are prepared in an automated fashion in an attempt to remove some human bias from the calculations. Many thousands of explicit and implicit ligand conformations may be docked in calculations not much longer than required for single conformer docking. As long as internal energies are not considered, recombination with the hierarchy is additive as the number of degrees of freedom is increased. Molecules with even millions of conformations can be docked in a few minutes on a single desktop computer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16101414      PMCID: PMC1364474          DOI: 10.2174/1568026054637683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem        ISSN: 1568-0266            Impact factor:   3.295


  44 in total

Review 1.  Dominant forces in protein folding.

Authors:  K A Dill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-08-07       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Here be dragons: docking and screening in an uncharted region of chemical space.

Authors:  Ruth Brenk; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2005-09-16

3.  Monte Carlo docking of oligopeptides to proteins.

Authors:  A Caflisch; P Niederer; M Anliker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1992-07

4.  Flexible protein-ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates.

Authors:  M Totrov; R Abagyan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1997

Review 5.  Automated docking of flexible ligands: applications of AutoDock.

Authors:  D S Goodsell; G M Morris; A J Olson
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.137

6.  Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles.

Authors:  D M Lorber; B K Shoichet
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm.

Authors:  M Rarey; B Kramer; T Lengauer; G Klebe
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-08-23       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen; A R Leach; R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Flexible ligand docking using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  C M Oshiro; I D Kuntz; J S Dixon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  FLOG: a system to select 'quasi-flexible' ligands complementary to a receptor of known three-dimensional structure.

Authors:  M D Miller; S K Kearsley; D J Underwood; R P Sheridan
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  62 in total

1.  Enzymatic deamination of the epigenetic base N-6-methyladenine.

Authors:  Siddhesh S Kamat; Hao Fan; J Michael Sauder; Stephen K Burley; Brian K Shoichet; Andrej Sali; Frank M Raushel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  The Recognition of Identical Ligands by Unrelated Proteins.

Authors:  Sarah Barelier; Teague Sterling; Matthew J O'Meara; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.100

3.  Structure-Based Screening of Uncharted Chemical Space for Atypical Adenosine Receptor Agonists.

Authors:  David Rodríguez; Saibal Chakraborty; Eugene Warnick; Steven Crane; Zhan-Guo Gao; Robert O'Connor; Kenneth A Jacobson; Jens Carlsson
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Brian K Shoichet; John J Irwin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Comprehensive mechanistic analysis of hits from high-throughput and docking screens against beta-lactamase.

Authors:  Kerim Babaoglu; Anton Simeonov; John J Irwin; Michael E Nelson; Brian Feng; Craig J Thomas; Laura Cancian; M Paola Costi; David A Maltby; Ajit Jadhav; James Inglese; Christopher P Austin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Muscarinic receptors as model targets and antitargets for structure-based ligand discovery.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Dahlia R Weiss; Mario Rossi; Jianxin Hu; Kelly Hu; Katrin Eitel; Peter Gmeiner; Jürgen Wess; Brian K Kobilka; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Functional validation of virtual screening for novel agents with general anesthetic action at ligand-gated ion channels.

Authors:  Stephanie A Heusser; Rebecca J Howard; Cecilia M Borghese; Madeline A Cullins; Torben Broemstrup; Ui S Lee; Erik Lindahl; Jens Carlsson; R Adron Harris
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; John J Irwin; Guangqiang Dong; Brian K Shoichet; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Structure-based discovery of prescription drugs that interact with the norepinephrine transporter, NET.

Authors:  Avner Schlessinger; Ethan Geier; Hao Fan; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet; Kathleen M Giacomini; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Evaluation of different virtual screening programs for docking in a charged binding pocket.

Authors:  Wei Deng; Christophe L M J Verlinde
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.