Literature DB >> 19145019

Localized attentional interference reflects competition for reentrant processing.

Kelly S Steelman-Allen1, Jason S McCarley, Jeffrey R W Mounts.   

Abstract

Visual performance is compromised when attention is divided between objects that are near one another in the visual field. It has been postulated that this effect, termed localized attentional interference (LAI), reflects competition between visual-object representations for the control of cortical neural responses. To determine whether LAI arises during feedforward processing or during reentrant processing, the present study examined the influence of poststimulus pattern and four-dot masks on the strength of the effect. Experiment 1 found that pattern masks, which are believed to compromise feedforward processing, do not produce stronger LAI than do four-dot masks, which are believed to leave feedforward processing undisrupted. Experiment 2 found that LAI is weaker when reentrant processing is interrupted shortly after initiation than it is when reentrant processing is allowed to run to completion. The results suggest that LAI emerges from competition between objects during reentrant processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19145019     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  26 in total

1.  Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe; Simon J Thorpe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The role of salience in localized attentional interference.

Authors:  Jeffrey R W Mounts; Brandon E Gavett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Localized attentional interference affects object individuation, not feature detection.

Authors:  Jason S McCarley; Jeffrey R W Mounts
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Attentional templates regulate competitive interactions among attended visual objects.

Authors:  Jeffrey R W Mounts; Jason S McCarley; Andrew M Terech
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-02

Review 5.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

7.  Speed of processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Thorpe; D Fize; C Marlot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A model for visual shape recognition.

Authors:  P M Milner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  The power of the feed-forward sweep.

Authors:  Rufin Vanrullen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.