Literature DB >> 12534765

Adverse drug event monitoring at the Food and Drug Administration.

Syed Rizwanuddin Ahmad1.   

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible not only for approving drugs but also for monitoring their safety after they reach the market. The complete adverse event profile of a drug is not known at the time of approval because of the small sample size, short duration, and limited generalizability of pre-approval clinical trials. This report describes the FDA's postmarketing surveillance system, to which many clinicians submit reports of adverse drug events encountered while treating their patients. Despite its limitations, the spontaneous reporting system is an extremely valuable mechanism by which hazards with drugs that were not observed or recognized at the time of approval are identified. Physicians are strongly encouraged to submit reports of adverse outcomes with suspect drugs to the FDA, and their reports make a difference. The FDA is strengthening its postmarketing surveillance with access to new data sources that have the potential to further improve the identification, quantification, and subsequent management of drug risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12534765      PMCID: PMC1494803          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20130.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  25 in total

1.  Myocarditis and cardiomyopathy associated with clozapine use in the United States.

Authors:  L La Grenade; D Graham; A Trontell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Underreporting of hemorrhagic stroke associated with phenylpropanolamine.

Authors:  L La Grenade; D J Graham; P Nourjah
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-12-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring, its database, and the technical support of the Uppsala Monitoring Center.

Authors:  M Lindquist; I R Edwards
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  J Lazarou; B H Pomeranz; P N Corey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas.

Authors:  J P Ioannidis; J Lau
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 Jan 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Postmarketing reports of QT prolongation and ventricular arrhythmia in association with cisapride and Food and Drug Administration regulatory actions.

Authors:  D K Wysowski; A Corken; H Gallo-Torres; L Talarico; E M Rodriguez
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Congestive heart failure associated with itraconazole.

Authors:  S R Ahmad; S J Singer; B G Leissa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Liver enzyme monitoring in patients treated with troglitazone.

Authors:  D J Graham; C R Drinkard; D Shatin; Y Tsong; M J Burgess
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  An analysis of reports of depression and suicide in patients treated with isotretinoin.

Authors:  D K Wysowski; M Pitts; J Beitz
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Contraindicated use of cisapride: impact of food and drug administration regulatory action.

Authors:  W Smalley; D Shatin; D K Wysowski; J Gurwitz; S E Andrade; M Goodman; K A Chan; R Platt; S D Schech; W A Ray
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  Quantifying adverse drug events : are systematic reviews the answer?

Authors:  Mahyar Etminan; Bruce Carleton; Paula A Rochon
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Pharmacy student perceptions of adverse event reporting.

Authors:  Sirisha Kalari; Matthew Dormarunno; Oleg Zvenigorodsky; Aparna Mohan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Texas pharmacists' opinions on reporting serious adverse drug events to the Food and Drug Administration: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Paul Gavaza; Carolyn M Brown; Star Khoza
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-07-23

Review 4.  Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review.

Authors:  Abeed Sarker; Rachel Ginn; Azadeh Nikfarjam; Karen O'Connor; Karen Smith; Swetha Jayaraman; Tejaswi Upadhaya; Graciela Gonzalez
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  An adverse drug event and medication error reporting system for ambulatory care (MEADERS).

Authors:  Atif Zafar; John Hickner; Wilson Pace; William Tierney
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

6.  Empirical performance of LGPS and LEOPARD: lessons for developing a risk identification and analysis system.

Authors:  Martijn J Schuemie; David Madigan; Patrick B Ryan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Adverse event detection in drug development: recommendations and obligations beyond phase 3.

Authors:  Jesse A Berlin; Susan C Glasser; Susan S Ellenberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Portable automatic text classification for adverse drug reaction detection via multi-corpus training.

Authors:  Abeed Sarker; Graciela Gonzalez
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Reply to Hardalo et al., "Myelosuppression with Oxazolidinones: Are There Differences?"

Authors:  Aisling R Caffrey; Erica Yookyung Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  A pharmacovigilance study of antihypertensive medicines at a South delhi hospital.

Authors:  A Hussain; M Aqil; M S Alam; M R Khan; P Kapur; K K Pillai
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.975

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.