Literature DB >> 11122591

Contraindicated use of cisapride: impact of food and drug administration regulatory action.

W Smalley1, D Shatin, D K Wysowski, J Gurwitz, S E Andrade, M Goodman, K A Chan, R Platt, S D Schech, W A Ray.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Cisapride, a gastrointestinal tract promotility agent, can cause life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias in patients susceptible either because of concurrent use of medications that interfere with cisapride metabolism or prolong the QT interval or because of the presence of other diseases that predispose to such arrhythmias. In June 1998, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that use of cisapride was contraindicated in such patients and informed practitioners through additions to the boxed warning in the label and a "Dear Health Care Professional" letter sent by the drug's manufacturer.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the FDA's 1998 regulatory action regarding contraindicated use of cisapride. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Analysis of data for the 1-year periods before (July 1997-June 1998) and after (July 1998-June 1999) the regulatory action from the population-based, pharmacoepidemiology research databases of 2 managed care organizations (sites A and B) and a state Medicaid program (site C). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with at least 180 days of prior enrollment in 1 of the 3 sites who were prescribed cisapride at least once in the period before (n = 24 840) or after (n = 22 459) regulatory action. Patients could be included in both cohorts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of cisapride users in each period for whom cisapride use was contraindicated by the product label, based on computerized patient medical encounter records.
RESULTS: In the year prior to regulatory action, cisapride use was contraindicated for 26%, 30%, and 60% of users in study sites A, B, and C, respectively. In the year after regulatory action, use was contraindicated for 24%, 28%, and 58% of users, a reduction in contraindicated use of approximately 2 per 100 cisapride users at each site. When the analysis was restricted to new users of cisapride after regulatory action, only minor reductions in contraindicated use were found.
CONCLUSION: The FDA's 1998 regulatory action regarding cisapride use had no material effect on contraindicated cisapride use. More effective ways to communicate new information about drug safety are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11122591     DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.23.3036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  58 in total

1.  Postmarketing drug surveillance: what it would take to make it work.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Lessons from cisapride.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Challenges in implementing a knowledge editor for the Arden Syntax: knowledge base maintenance and standardization of database linkages.

Authors:  Robert A Jenders; Balendu Dasgupta
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

4.  Adverse drug event monitoring at the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Syed Rizwanuddin Ahmad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Knowledge deficits related to the QT interval could affect patient safety.

Authors:  Nancy M Allen LaPointe; Sana M Al-Khatib; Judith M Kramer; Robert M Califf
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 6.  The significance of QT interval in drug development.

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Communication of medical product risk: how effective is effective enough?

Authors:  Stephen A Goldman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  CIOMS and ICH initiatives in pharmacovigilance and risk management: overview and implications.

Authors:  Panos Tsintis; Edith La Mache
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Impact of safety-related regulatory action on clinical practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sigrid Piening; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Jonie T N de Vries; Menno E van der Elst; Pieter A de Graeff; Sabine M J M Straus; Peter G M Mol
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  A decade of safety-related regulatory action in the Netherlands: a retrospective analysis of direct healthcare professional communications from 1999 to 2009.

Authors:  Peter G M Mol; Sabine M J M Straus; Sigrid Piening; Jonie T N de Vries; Pieter A de Graeff; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.