Literature DB >> 25720841

Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review.

Abeed Sarker1, Rachel Ginn2, Azadeh Nikfarjam2, Karen O'Connor2, Karen Smith3, Swetha Jayaraman4, Tejaswi Upadhaya4, Graciela Gonzalez2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Automatic monitoring of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), defined as adverse patient outcomes caused by medications, is a challenging research problem that is currently receiving significant attention from the medical informatics community. In recent years, user-posted data on social media, primarily due to its sheer volume, has become a useful resource for ADR monitoring. Research using social media data has progressed using various data sources and techniques, making it difficult to compare distinct systems and their performances. In this paper, we perform a methodical review to characterize the different approaches to ADR detection/extraction from social media, and their applicability to pharmacovigilance. In addition, we present a potential systematic pathway to ADR monitoring from social media.
METHODS: We identified studies describing approaches for ADR detection from social media from the Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases, and the Google Scholar search engine. Studies that met our inclusion criteria were those that attempted to extract ADR information posted by users on any publicly available social media platform. We categorized the studies according to different characteristics such as primary ADR detection approach, size of corpus, data source(s), availability, and evaluation criteria.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met our inclusion criteria, with fifteen (68%) published within the last two years. However, publicly available annotated data is still scarce, and we found only six studies that made the annotations used publicly available, making system performance comparisons difficult. In terms of algorithms, supervised classification techniques to detect posts containing ADR mentions, and lexicon-based approaches for extraction of ADR mentions from texts have been the most popular.
CONCLUSION: Our review suggests that interest in the utilization of the vast amounts of available social media data for ADR monitoring is increasing. In terms of sources, both health-related and general social media data have been used for ADR detection-while health-related sources tend to contain higher proportions of relevant data, the volume of data from general social media websites is significantly higher. There is still very limited amount of annotated data publicly available , and, as indicated by the promising results obtained by recent supervised learning approaches, there is a strong need to make such data available to the research community.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse drug reaction; Pharmacovigilance; Social media

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25720841      PMCID: PMC4408239          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  29 in total

1.  Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program.

Authors:  A R Aronson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  Predicting adverse drug events from personal health messages.

Authors:  Brant W Chee; Richard Berlin; Bruce Schatz
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

3.  Social media in public health.

Authors:  Taha A Kass-Hout; Hend Alhinnawi
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Social media and networks in pharmacovigilance: boon or bane?

Authors:  I Ralph Edwards; Marie Lindquist
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Using social media and internet data for public health surveillance: the importance of talking.

Authors:  David M Hartley
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Identifying potential adverse effects using the web: a new approach to medical hypothesis generation.

Authors:  Adrian Benton; Lyle Ungar; Shawndra Hill; Sean Hennessy; Jun Mao; Annie Chung; Charles E Leonard; John H Holmes
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 7.  A systematic review to evaluate the accuracy of electronic adverse drug event detection.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Alison Jennings; Claire Chow; Ciera Leeder; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Using Web and social media for influenza surveillance.

Authors:  Courtney D Corley; Diane J Cook; Armin R Mikler; Karan P Singh
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Extraction of potential adverse drug events from medical case reports.

Authors:  Harsha Gurulingappa; Abdul Mateen-Rajput; Luca Toldo
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2012-12-20

Review 10.  Social media and internet-based data in global systems for public health surveillance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Edward Velasco; Tumacha Agheneza; Kerstin Denecke; Göran Kirchner; Tim Eckmanns
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.911

View more
  126 in total

1.  A Multiagent System for Integrated Detection of Pharmacovigilance Signals.

Authors:  Vassilis Koutkias; Marie-Christine Jaulent
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Social Media Listening for Routine Post-Marketing Safety Surveillance.

Authors:  Gregory E Powell; Harry A Seifert; Tjark Reblin; Phil J Burstein; James Blowers; J Alan Menius; Jeffery L Painter; Michele Thomas; Carrie E Pierce; Harold W Rodriguez; John S Brownstein; Clark C Freifeld; Heidi G Bell; Nabarun Dasgupta
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Bridging semantics and syntax with graph algorithms-state-of-the-art of extracting biomedical relations.

Authors:  Yuan Luo; Özlem Uzuner; Peter Szolovits
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Mining Social Media Data for Biomedical Signals and Health-Related Behavior.

Authors:  Rion Brattig Correia; Ian B Wood; Johan Bollen; Luis M Rocha
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci       Date:  2020-05-04

5.  Classification of Helpful Comments on Online Suicide Watch Forums.

Authors:  Ramakanth Kavuluru; Amanda G Williams; María Ramos-Morales; Laura Haye; Tara Holaday; Julie Cerel
Journal:  ACM BCB       Date:  2016-10

6.  A new version of the ANDSystem tool for automatic extraction of knowledge from scientific publications with expanded functionality for reconstruction of associative gene networks by considering tissue-specific gene expression.

Authors:  Vladimir A Ivanisenko; Pavel S Demenkov; Timofey V Ivanisenko; Elena L Mishchenko; Olga V Saik
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  A systematic literature review of machine learning in online personal health data.

Authors:  Zhijun Yin; Lina M Sulieman; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Authors' Reply to Jouanjus and Colleagues' Comment on "Social Media Mining for Toxicovigilance: Automatic Monitoring of Prescription Medication Abuse from Twitter".

Authors:  Abeed Sarker; Dan Malone; Graciela Gonzalez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Leveraging digital media data for pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Hammad Farooq; Junaid Suhail Niaz; Saira Fakhar; Hammad Naveed
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

10.  Knowledge-Based Biomedical Word Sense Disambiguation with Neural Concept Embeddings

Authors:  Akm Sabbir; Antonio Jimeno-Yepes; Ramakanth Kavuluru
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Bioinformatics Bioeng       Date:  2018-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.