Literature DB >> 21969717

Pharmacy student perceptions of adverse event reporting.

Sirisha Kalari1, Matthew Dormarunno, Oleg Zvenigorodsky, Aparna Mohan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess US pharmacy students' knowledge and perceptions of adverse event reporting.
METHODS: To gauge pharmacy students' impressions of adverse event reporting, a 10-question survey instrument was administered that addressed student perceptions of the reporting procedures of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and pharmaceutical manufacturers, as well as student understanding of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and its relationship to adverse event reporting.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-eight pharmacy students responded to the survey. The majority of respondents believed that the FDA is more likely than a pharmaceutical company to take action regarding an adverse event. There were misconceptions relating to the way adverse event reports are handled and the influence of HIPAA regulations on reporting.
CONCLUSIONS: Communication between the FDA and pharmaceutical manufacturers regarding adverse event reports is not well understood by pharmacy students. Education about adverse event reporting should evolve so that by the time pharmacy students become practitioners, they are well acquainted with the relevance and importance of adverse event reporting.

Keywords:  FDA; HIPAA; adverse drug reaction; adverse event; adverse event reporting; pharmacists; pharmacy students

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21969717      PMCID: PMC3175663          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe757131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  6 in total

1.  Adverse drug event monitoring at the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Syed Rizwanuddin Ahmad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Adverse drug reaction and medication error reporting by pharmacy students.

Authors:  Erin L Sears; Joyce A Generali
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  FDA attempting to overcome major roadblocks in monitoring drug safety.

Authors:  Sarah L Zielinski
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Spending on postapproval drug safety.

Authors:  David B Ridley; Judith M Kramer; Hugh H Tilson; Henry G Grabowski; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  Pharmacovigilance in the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  J C Talbot; B S Nilsson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Medication therapy management services: definitions and outcomes.

Authors:  Annette N Pellegrino; Michelle T Martin; Jessica J Tilton; Daniel R Touchette
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Pharmacy students' attitudes toward reporting serious adverse drug events.

Authors:  Paul Gavaza; Bihn Bui
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Adverse drug event reporting: awareness is not enough.

Authors:  Joyce A Generali
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-02

3.  An evaluation of the knowledge and perceptions of pharmacy students on pharmacovigilance activities in Nigeria.

Authors:  Kanayo P Osemene; Margaret O Afolabi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-07-12

4.  Healthcare students' knowledge, attitude and perception of pharmacovigilance: A systematic review.

Authors:  Monira Alwhaibi; Noha A Al Aloola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.