Literature DB >> 12533319

Line scan diffusion imaging of the spine.

Roland Bammer1, Andreas M Herneth, Stephan E Maier, Kim Butts, Rupert W Prokesch, Huy M Do, Scott W Atlas, Michael E Moseley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Recent findings suggest that diffusion-weighted imaging might be an important adjunct to the diagnostic workup of disease processes in the spine, but physiological motion and the challenging magnetic environment make it difficult to perform reliable quantitative diffusion measurements. Multi-section line scan diffusion imaging of the spine was implemented and evaluated to provide quantitative diffusion measurements of vertebral bodies and intervertebral disks.
METHODS: Line scan diffusion imaging of 12 healthy study participants and three patients with benign vertebral compression fractures was performed to assess the potential of line scan diffusion imaging of the spinal column. In a subgroup of six participants, multiple b-value (5-3005 s/mm(2)) images were obtained to test for multi-exponential signal decay.
RESULTS: All images were diagnostic and of high quality. Mean diffusion values were (230 +/- 83) x 10(-6) mm(2)/s in the vertebral bodies, (1645 +/- 213) x 10(-6) mm(2)/s in the nuclei pulposi, (837 +/- 318) x 10(-6) mm(2)/s in the annuli fibrosi and ranged from 1019 x 10(-6) mm(2)/s to 1972 x 10(-6) mm(2)/s in benign compression fractures. The mean relative intra-participant variation of mean diffusivity among different vertebral segments (T10-L5) was 2.97%, whereas the relative difference in mean diffusivity among participants was 7.41% (P <.0001). The estimated measurement precision was <2%. A bi-exponential diffusion attenuation was found only in vertebral bodies.
CONCLUSION: Line scan diffusion imaging is a robust and reliable method for imaging the spinal column. It does not suffer as strongly from susceptibility artifacts as does echo-planar imaging and is less susceptible to patient motion than are other multi-shot techniques. The different contributions from the water and fat fractions need to be considered in diffusion-weighted imaging of the vertebral bodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12533319      PMCID: PMC8148972     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  22 in total

1.  Apparent diffusion coefficient in thoracolumbar intervertebral discs of healthy young volunteers.

Authors:  L I Kerttula; J P Jauhiainen; O Tervonen; I J Suramo; A Koivula; J T Oikarinen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Line scan diffusion imaging.

Authors:  H Gudbjartsson; S E Maier; R V Mulkern; I A Mórocz; S Patz; F A Jolesz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: a closer step toward the "holy grail" of tissue characterization?

Authors:  D J Le Bihan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Diagnostic value of increased diffusion weighting of a steady-state free precession sequence for differentiating acute benign osteoporotic fractures from pathologic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  A Baur; A Huber; B Ertl-Wagner; R Dürr; S Zysk; S Arbogast; M Deimling; M Reiser
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Characterization of benign and metastatic vertebral compression fractures with quantitative diffusion MR imaging.

Authors:  Xiaohong Joe Zhou; Norman E Leeds; Graeme C McKinnon; Ashok J Kumar
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Simultaneous calculation of flow and diffusion sensitivity in steady-state free precession imaging.

Authors:  H Gudbjartsson; S Patz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of benign spinal lesions simulating metastasis: role of diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  N E Leeds; A J Kumar; X J Zhou; G C McKinnon
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-08

8.  Diffusion tensor microscopy of the intervertebral disc anulus fibrosus.

Authors:  E W Hsu; L A Setton
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases.

Authors:  M Castillo; A Arbelaez; J K Smith; L L Fisher
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Comparison of diffusion-weighted MRI and CT in acute stroke.

Authors:  M G Lansberg; G W Albers; C Beaulieu; M P Marks
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  25 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spine: is it reliable?

Authors:  Mauricio Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Association of lumbar artery narrowing, degenerative changes in disc and endplate and apparent diffusion in disc on postcontrast enhancement of lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Jaakko Niinimäki; Arto Korkiakoski; Outi Parviainen; Marianne Haapea; Mari Kuisma; Risto O Ojala; Jaro Karppinen; Raija Korpelainen; Osmo Tervonen; Miika T Nieminen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the neurologically intact human spinal cord.

Authors:  B M Ellingson; J L Ulmer; S N Kurpad; B D Schmit
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Quantitative evaluation of the tibial tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: a follow-up feasibility study.

Authors:  Mitja Rupreht; Vladimir Jevtič; Igor Serša; Matjaž Vogrin; Tomaž Seruga; Marko Jevšek
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  A new magnetic resonance-based technique for high-resolution quantification of amorphous and quasi-amorphous structures.

Authors:  James Rafferty; Lance Farr; Tim James; David Chase; John Heinrich; Michael Brady
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  T2 shine-through phenomena in diffusion-weighted MR imaging of lumbar discs after oxygen-ozone discolysis: a randomized, double-blind trial with steroid and O2-O3 discolysis versus steroid only.

Authors:  Marco Perri; Giuseppe Grattacaso; Valeria di Tunno; Claudia Marsecano; Antonio Gennarelli; Giulia Michelini; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi; Massimo Gallucci
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  MRI DWI/ADC signal predicts shrinkage of lumbar disc herniation after O2-O3 discolysis.

Authors:  Marco Perri; Giuseppe Grattacaso; Valeria Di Tunno; Claudia Marsecano; Ernesto Di Cesare; Alessandra Splendiani; Massimo Gallucci
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2015-04-13

8.  Benign versus metastatic vertebral compression fractures: combined diffusion-weighted MRI and MR spectroscopy aids differentiation.

Authors:  Helmut Rumpel; Yi Chong; David A Porter; Ling L Chan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in the evaluation of epidural spinal lesions.

Authors:  Christina Plank; Anke Koller; Christina Mueller-Mang; Roland Bammer; Majda M Thurnher
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Monitoring ankylosing spondylitis therapy by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Natasa Gaspersic; Igor Sersa; Vladimir Jevtic; Matija Tomsic; Sonja Praprotnik
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.