Literature DB >> 11156785

Diagnostic value of increased diffusion weighting of a steady-state free precession sequence for differentiating acute benign osteoporotic fractures from pathologic vertebral compression fractures.

A Baur1, A Huber, B Ertl-Wagner, R Dürr, S Zysk, S Arbogast, M Deimling, M Reiser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Differentiating acute benign from neoplastic vertebral compression fractures can pose a problem in differential diagnosis on routine MR sequences, as signal changes can be quite similar. Our purpose was to assess the value of increasing the diffusion weighting of a diffusion-weighted steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence for differentiating these two types of vertebral compression fractures.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with 32 acute vertebral compression fractures caused by osteoporosis (n = 15) or malignancy (n = 17) were examined with a diffusion-weighted SSFP sequence, a T1-weighted spin-echo sequence, and a short-inversion-time inversion recovery sequence. The SSFP sequence was performed with increased diffusion weighting (delta = 0.6, 3.0, 6.0, and 9.0 ms). The signal intensities of the fractured vertebral bodies were rated on a five-point scale from markedly hypointense to markedly hyperintense relative to normal adjacent vertebral bodies. Quantitative analysis was performed by region-of-interest measurements and by calculating the bone marrow contrast ratio. Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann Whitney U test and Student's t test.
RESULTS: At delta = 3 ms, the osteoporotic fractures yielded hypointense signal in seven cases, isointense signal in six, and hyperintense signal in two. The fractures showed a progressive signal loss with increased diffusion weighting, so that hypointensity was reached in all but one case. All metastatic fractures had hyperintense signal with delta = 3 and 6.0 ms. With delta = 9.0 ms, four fractures became isointense.
CONCLUSION: Increasing diffusion weighting can reduce false-positive hyperintense osteoporotic fractures or make hypointensity more obvious in cases of osteoporotic fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11156785      PMCID: PMC7973927     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  10 in total

1.  Effects of intravoxel incoherent motions (IVIM) in steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging: application to molecular diffusion imaging.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; R Turner; J R MacFall
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures.

Authors:  A Baur; A Stäbler; R Brüning; R Bartl; A Krödel; M Reiser; M Deimling
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; P Grenier; E Cabanis; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The diffusion sensitivity of fast steady-state free precession imaging.

Authors:  R B Buxton
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of rodent tumors using radiofrequency gradient echoes.

Authors:  G S Karczmar; J N River; Z Goldman; J Li; E Weisenberg; M Z Lewis; K Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI for the early detection of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats.

Authors:  J Mintorovitch; M E Moseley; L Chileuitt; H Shimizu; Y Cohen; P R Weinstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  MR diffusion imaging of cerebral infarction in humans.

Authors:  D Chien; K K Kwong; D R Gress; F S Buonanno; R B Buxton; B R Rosen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Osteogenic sarcoma: noninvasive in vivo assessment of tumor necrosis with diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  P Lang; M F Wendland; M Saeed; A Gindele; W Rosenau; A Mathur; C A Gooding; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Warach; J Gaa; B Siewert; P Wielopolski; R R Edelman
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Quantitative diffusion imaging in implanted human breast tumors.

Authors:  C F Maier; Y Paran; P Bendel; B K Rutt; H Degani
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.668

  10 in total
  27 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in a patient with vertebral and epidural abscesses.

Authors:  James D Eastwood; Robin T Vollmer; James M Provenzale
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spine: is it reliable?

Authors:  Mauricio Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in musculoskeletal radiology-clinical applications and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas Bhojwani; Peter Szpakowski; Sasan Partovi; Martin H Maurer; Ulrich Grosse; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Lisa Zipp-Partovi; Nathan Fergus; Christos Kosmas; Konstantin Nikolaou; Mark R Robbin
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-10

Review 4.  Extracranial applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Harriet C Thoeny; Frederik De Keyzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Optimising diffusion weighted MRI for imaging metastatic and myeloma bone disease and assessing reproducibility.

Authors:  C Messiou; D J Collins; V A Morgan; N M Desouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  PET/CT and MR imaging in myeloma.

Authors:  Michael E Mulligan; Ashraf Z Badros
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in abdominal oncology: clinical applications.

Authors:  Reiji Sugita; Kei Ito; Naotaka Fujita; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Line scan diffusion imaging of the spine.

Authors:  Roland Bammer; Andreas M Herneth; Stephan E Maier; Kim Butts; Rupert W Prokesch; Huy M Do; Scott W Atlas; Michael E Moseley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Benign versus metastatic vertebral compression fractures: combined diffusion-weighted MRI and MR spectroscopy aids differentiation.

Authors:  Helmut Rumpel; Yi Chong; David A Porter; Ling L Chan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.