Literature DB >> 12477898

Auditory encoding during the last moment of a moth's life.

James H Fullard1, Jeff W Dawson, David S Jacobs.   

Abstract

The simple auditory system of noctuoid moths has long been a model for anti-predator studies in neuroethology, although these ears have rarely been experimentally stimulated by the sounds they would encounter from naturally attacking bats. We exposed the ears of five noctuoid moth species to the pre-recorded echolocation calls of an attacking bat (Eptesicus fuscus) to observe the acoustic encoding of the receptors at this critical time in their defensive behaviour. The B cell is a non-tympanal receptor common to all moths that has been suggested to respond to sound, but we found no evidence of this and suggest that its acoustic responsiveness is an artifact arising from its proprioceptive function. The A1 cell, the most sensitive tympanal receptor in noctuid and arctiid moths and the only auditory receptor in notodontid moths, encodes the attack calls with a bursting firing pattern to a point approximately 150 ms from when the bat would have captured the moth. At this point, the firing of the A1 cell reduces to a non-bursting pattern with longer inter-spike periods, suggesting that the moth may no longer express the erratic flight used to escape very close bats. This may be simply due to the absence of selection pressure on moths for auditory tracking of bat echolocation calls beyond this point. Alternatively, the reduced firing may be due to the acoustic characteristics of attack calls in the terminal phase and an acoustic maneuver used by the bat to facilitate its capture of the moth. Although the role of less sensitive A2 cell remains uncertain in the evasive flight responses of moths it may act as a trigger in eliciting sound production, a close-range anti-bat behaviour in the tiger moth, Cycnia tenera.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12477898     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  12 in total

1.  Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear.

Authors:  Matthew E Jackson; Navdeep S Asi; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The relative influence of competition and prey defences on the trophic structure of animalivorous bat ensembles.

Authors:  M Corrie Schoeman; David S Jacobs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  No neural evidence for dynamic auditory tuning of the A1 receptor in the ear of the noctuid moth, Noctua pronuba.

Authors:  Navdeep S Asi; James Howard Fullard; Scott Whitehead; Jeff W Dawson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Manfred Kössl; Emanuel C Mora
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Sensory ecology of predator-prey interactions: responses of the AN2 interneuron in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus to the echolocation calls of sympatric bats.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; Cassandra Guignion
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Reliable detection of predator cues in afferent spike trains of a katydid under high background noise levels.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Gerald Radspieler; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Ignoring the irrelevant: auditory tolerance of audible but innocuous sounds in the bat-detecting ears of moths.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; David S Jacobs
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-11-22

8.  Tiger moths and the threat of bats: decision-making based on the activity of a single sensory neuron.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; James H Fullard; Benjamin J Arthur; Ronald R Hoy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Bursting neurons and ultrasound avoidance in crickets.

Authors:  Gary Marsat; Gerald S Pollack
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Optimal predator risk assessment by the sonar-jamming arctiine moth Bertholdia trigona.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Ryan D Wagner; William E Conner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.