Literature DB >> 18038121

Ignoring the irrelevant: auditory tolerance of audible but innocuous sounds in the bat-detecting ears of moths.

James H Fullard1, John M Ratcliffe, David S Jacobs.   

Abstract

Noctuid moths listen for the echolocation calls of hunting bats and respond to these predator cues with evasive flight. The African bollworm moth, Helicoverpa armigera, feeds at flowers near intensely singing cicadas, Platypleura capensis, yet does not avoid them. We determined that the moth can hear the cicada by observing that both of its auditory receptors (A1 and A2 cells) respond to the cicada's song. The firing response of the A1 cell rapidly adapts to the song and develops spike periods in less than a second that are in excess of those reported to elicit avoidance flight to bats in earlier studies. The possibility also exists that for at least part of the day, sensory input in the form of olfaction or vision overrides the moth's auditory responses. While auditory tolerance appears to allow H. armigera to exploit a food resource in close proximity to acoustic interference, it may render their hearing defence ineffective and make them vulnerable to predation by bats during the evening when cicadas continue to sing. Our study describes the first field observation of an eared insect ignoring audible but innocuous sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18038121     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-007-0323-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  12 in total

1.  Auditory encoding during the last moment of a moth's life.

Authors:  James H Fullard; Jeff W Dawson; David S Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Temporal pattern recognition based on instantaneous spike rate coding in a simple auditory system.

Authors:  A Nabatiyan; J F A Poulet; G G de Polavieja; B Hedwig
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Insect pests of beans in Africa: their ecology and management.

Authors:  T Abate; J K Ampofo
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 19.686

4.  Pulse-rate recognition in an insect: evidence of a role for oscillatory neurons.

Authors:  Sarah L Bush; Johannes Schul
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Information processing at a central synapse suggests a noise filter in the auditory pathway of the noctuid moth.

Authors:  G S Boyan; J H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Responses to acoustic stimulation of thoracic interneurons in noctuid moths.

Authors:  D H Paul
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.354

7.  Normal hearing thresholds for clicks.

Authors:  D R Stapells; T W Picton; A D Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Interneurons of the thoracic nerve cord activated by tympanic nerve fibres in noctuid moths.

Authors:  K D Roeder
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 2.354

Review 9.  Pulses, patterns and paths: neurobiology of acoustic behaviour in crickets.

Authors:  Berthold Hedwig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  The allometry of echolocation call frequencies of insectivorous bats: why do some species deviate from the pattern?

Authors:  David S Jacobs; Robert M R Barclay; Maryalice H Walker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 3.298

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiology goes wild: from exploring sensory coding in sound proof rooms to natural environments.

Authors:  Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 1.836

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.