Literature DB >> 19727759

No neural evidence for dynamic auditory tuning of the A1 receptor in the ear of the noctuid moth, Noctua pronuba.

Navdeep S Asi1, James Howard Fullard, Scott Whitehead, Jeff W Dawson.   

Abstract

By examining the mechanical properties of the tympanum of the noctuid moth, Noctua pronuba, Windmill et al. (2006) suggested that this insect increases (up-tunes) the frequencies of its best hearing when exposed to high intensity sounds (HIS) resembling the echolocation calls of attacking bats. We tested whether this biophysical phenomenon was encoded in the neural responses of this moth's most sensitive auditory receptor (A1 cell) before and after exposure to HIS. We measured: (1) the number of A1 action potentials (spikes) per stimulus pulse; (2) the proportion of A1 spike periods below that determined to elicit evasive flight maneuvers and, (3) the change in A1 cell firing (spike number, interspike interval, stimulus/spike latency) over a duration of time similar to that in which up-tuning lasts. We observed no significant spiking response changes in the predicted direction to any of the frequencies tested following exposure to HIS and we observed only two of the 24 predicted time-dependent changes to A1 firing. These results indicate that tympanal up-tuning does not result in a change to this moth's auditory frequency sensitivity and we suggest either sensillar resonances or increases in thoracic muscle tension following exposure to HIS as alternative explanations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19727759     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-009-0471-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  8 in total

1.  Auditory encoding during the last moment of a moth's life.

Authors:  James H Fullard; Jeff W Dawson; David S Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Ultrasonic reception by the tympanic organ of noctuid moths.

Authors:  K D ROEDER; A E TREAT
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1957-02

3.  Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  A Surlykke; C F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Responses of the less sensitive acoustic sense cells in the tympanic organs of some noctuid and geometrid moths.

Authors:  K D Roeder
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.354

5.  Acoustic sensitivity of the noctuid tympanic organ and its range for the cries of bats.

Authors:  K D Roeder
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.354

6.  Keeping up with bats: dynamic auditory tuning in a moth.

Authors:  James Frederick Charles Windmill; Joseph Curt Jackson; Elizabeth Jane Tuck; Daniel Robert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The peripheral auditory characteristics of noctuid moths: responses to the search-phase echolocation calls of bats

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Mechanics of a 'simple' ear: tympanal vibrations in noctuid moths.

Authors:  J F C Windmill; J H Fullard; D Robert
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.312

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear.

Authors:  Matthew E Jackson; Navdeep S Asi; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Unexpected dynamic up-tuning of auditory organs in day-flying moths.

Authors:  Emanuel C Mora; Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Frank Macías-Escrivá; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 1.836

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.