Literature DB >> 12458860

Incidence of lens opacities and clinically significant cataracts with the implantable contact lens: comparison of two lens designs.

Donald R Sanders1, John A Vukich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of anterior subcapsular lens opacities, clinically significant cataracts, secondary lens-related surgical reinterventions, and vaulting characteristics of the now discontinued V3 and currently used V4 Staar Surgical Implantable Contact Lens (ICL) phakic intraocular lens designs.
METHODS: In this non-randomized prospective clinical trial, 87 eyes were implanted with the V3 and 523 eyes with the V4 ICL as part of the U.S. FDA clinical trial for myopia. LOCS III assessment of lens opacities, clinically significant cataract, ICL vaulting (clearance between ICL and crystalline lens), and secondary ICL-related surgeries were the main outcome measures. Mean follow-up in the V3 series was 30.7 +/- 10.0 months (range 10.8 to 49.3 mo) and in the V4 series, 17.3 +/- 6.9 months (range 0.25 to 38.5 mo).
RESULTS: Incidence of anterior subcapsular opacities was significantly higher with the V3 vs. V4 ICL (12.6% vs. 2.9%, P<.001). The difference was largely due to the higher rate of late-appearing opacities (> or = 1 year after surgery; 9.2% vs. 0.6%, P<.001). The V3 group had a greater proportion of eyes with poor vault (23.6% vs. 4.3%, P<.001) and the presence of poor vault was highly associated with the development of late anterior subcapsular opacities (P<.001). Clinically significant cataract was more frequent in the V3 vs. V4 ICL (9.2% vs. 0.8%, P<.001), as was cataract extraction (6.9% vs. 0.2%, P<.001), and need for ICL replacement (5.7% vs. 1.1%, P<.001). Differences in opacity rate between the V3 and V4 designs were not due to differences in postoperative follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Implantation of the currently used V4 Staar Surgical model ICL resulted in significantly less anterior subcapsular opacities, clinically significant cataracts, and secondary ICL-related surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12458860     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20021101-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Phakic intraocular lenses. Current status and limitations].

Authors:  H B Dick; M Tehrani
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Fluid dynamics simulation of aqueous humour in a posterior-chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central perforation.

Authors:  Takushi Kawamorita; Hiroshi Uozato; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Three-year follow-up of subjective vault following myopic implantable collamer lens implantation.

Authors:  José F Alfonso; Carlos Lisa; A Abdelhamid; Paulo Fernandes; Jorge Jorge; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  An interesting case of implantable contact lens.

Authors:  V K Mohindra; Savio Pereira
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2013-06-21

5.  Modulation transfer function of intraocular collamer lens with a central artificial hole.

Authors:  Hiroshi Uozato; Kimiya Shimizu; Takushi Kawamorita; Fumiko Ohmoto
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Correlation of anterior chamber angle and ciliary sulcus diameters with white-to-white corneal diameter in high myopes using artemis VHF digital ultrasound.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Ronald H Silverman; Mark J Rondeau; D Jackson Coleman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Outcome of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens procedure to correct myopia.

Authors:  Nasser Al Sabaani; Abdullah Al Assiri; Abdullah Al Torbak; Saeed Al Motawa
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-01

8.  Long-term refractive outcomes of posterior chamber phakic (spheric and toric implantable collamer lens) intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Arturo Gomez-Bastar; Martha Jaimes; Enrique O Graue-Hernández; Tito Ramirez-Luquin; Arturo Ramirez-Miranda; Alejandro Navas
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Implantable collamer lens versus iris-fixed phakic intraocular lens implantation to correct myopia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guan-Lu Liang; Jing Wu; Jun-Ting Shi; Jian Liu; Feng-Ying He; Wen Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transient reduction in the retinal microvascular network following implantation surgery of implantable collamer lens: An OCT angiography study.

Authors:  Xiaojun Hu; Peng Wang; Chengcheng Zhu; Ying Yuan; Mingming Liu; Bilian Ke
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.