PURPOSE: To determine whether horizontal angle diameter and sulcus diameter can be accurately estimated by conventional external measurements in high myopic eyes. METHODS: Ten horizontal anterior segment scans were obtained with the Artemis 1 very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound arc-scanner in 40 eyes of 20 patients. Angle and sulcus diameters were measured and descriptive statistics and within-eye repeatability were calculated. Linear regression was performed between each permutation of white-to-white, angle diameter, and sulcus diameter. Multivariate regression also included anterior chamber depth (ACD), age, manifest refraction, keratometry, and central corneal thickness (CCT). The standard deviation and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the residuals were calculated. RESULTS: The population mean +/-standard deviation (95% CI) was 12.88 +/- 0.42 mm [12.74, 13.02] for angle diameter and 12.85 +/- 0.69 mm [12.63, 13.07] for sulcus diameter. Within-eye repeatability was 0.13 mm for angle diameter and 0.23 mm for sulcus diameter. A weak correlation was noted between white-to-white and angle diameter (r2=0.59) with a 95% CI of +/-0.53 mm. Multivariate regression found white-to-white, CCT, and minimum keratometry predicted angle diameter (r2=0.69) with a 95% CI of +/-0.46 mm. For predicting sulcus diameter, there were weak correlations between white-to-white (r2=0.32) with a 95% CI of +/-1.11 mm and angle diameter (r2=0.46) with a 95% CI of +/-0.99 mm. Multivariate regression found angle diameter and ACD predicted sulcus diameter (r2=0.57) with 95% CI of +/-0.88 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Regression modeling found weak correlations among all combinations of white-to-white, angle diameter, and sulcus diameter. Given the relative accuracy of direct measurement of angle and sulcus diameter compared to the potential accuracy of these regression equations, it appears that direct measurement would increase the safety of anterior and posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens sizing.
PURPOSE: To determine whether horizontal angle diameter and sulcus diameter can be accurately estimated by conventional external measurements in high myopic eyes. METHODS: Ten horizontal anterior segment scans were obtained with the Artemis 1 very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound arc-scanner in 40 eyes of 20 patients. Angle and sulcus diameters were measured and descriptive statistics and within-eye repeatability were calculated. Linear regression was performed between each permutation of white-to-white, angle diameter, and sulcus diameter. Multivariate regression also included anterior chamber depth (ACD), age, manifest refraction, keratometry, and central corneal thickness (CCT). The standard deviation and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the residuals were calculated. RESULTS: The population mean +/-standard deviation (95% CI) was 12.88 +/- 0.42 mm [12.74, 13.02] for angle diameter and 12.85 +/- 0.69 mm [12.63, 13.07] for sulcus diameter. Within-eye repeatability was 0.13 mm for angle diameter and 0.23 mm for sulcus diameter. A weak correlation was noted between white-to-white and angle diameter (r2=0.59) with a 95% CI of +/-0.53 mm. Multivariate regression found white-to-white, CCT, and minimum keratometry predicted angle diameter (r2=0.69) with a 95% CI of +/-0.46 mm. For predicting sulcus diameter, there were weak correlations between white-to-white (r2=0.32) with a 95% CI of +/-1.11 mm and angle diameter (r2=0.46) with a 95% CI of +/-0.99 mm. Multivariate regression found angle diameter and ACD predicted sulcus diameter (r2=0.57) with 95% CI of +/-0.88 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Regression modeling found weak correlations among all combinations of white-to-white, angle diameter, and sulcus diameter. Given the relative accuracy of direct measurement of angle and sulcus diameter compared to the potential accuracy of these regression equations, it appears that direct measurement would increase the safety of anterior and posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens sizing.
Authors: Liliana Werner; Andrea M Izak; Suresh K Pandey; David J Apple; Rupal H Trivedi; Josef M Schmidbauer Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: D Y Kim; D Z Reinstein; R H Silverman; D J Najafi; S C Belmont; A P Hatsis; G W Rozakis; D J Coleman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: J J Pérez-Santonja; M T Iradier; J M Benítez del Castillo; J M Serrano; M A Zato Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: César A Sánchez-Galeana; Ronald J Smith; Donald R Sanders; Francisco X Rodríguez; Sergio Litwak; Miguel Montes; Arturo S Chayet Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Francesco Matarazzo; Alexander Clifford Day; Luis Fernandez-Vega Cueto; Vincenzo Maurino Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe; Ronald H Silverman; D Jackson Coleman Journal: J Refract Surg Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Ahmed Abass; Bernardo T Lopes; Ashkan Eliasy; Richard Wu; Steve Jones; John Clamp; Renato Ambrósio; Ahmed Elsheikh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 3.240