Literature DB >> 12454966

Parental decisions to abort or continue a pregnancy with an abnormal finding after an invasive prenatal test.

Joël Zlotogora1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the importance of various factors on the decisions whether to terminate or continue a pregnancy after an abnormal result.
METHODS: The decisions of 1467 women who had an abnormal result after an invasive prenatal test were examined according to their religion, the time of diagnosis and the severity of the disorder.
RESULTS: When the examinations were performed by chorionic villus sampling (CVS) among both Jews and non-Jews most of the women opted to terminate the affected pregnancy. After amniocentesis the rate of termination of pregnancy was still very high among cases in which Down syndrome or other significant chromosomal aberrations were diagnosed among Jews. For all the other diagnostic groups either among Jews or non-Jews there was a significant proportion of the cases in which the women decided to continue the pregnancy. A significant exception about the decisions of the couples was in the case of hemoglobinopathy-affected pregnancies among Arabs since both after CVS and amniocentesis many women often decided to continue the pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: The main factor in the decision to terminate or continue the pregnancy is the severity of the disorder diagnosed. However, among Arabs other factors are important, in particular the time at which the diagnosis is made. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12454966     DOI: 10.1002/pd.472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  12 in total

1.  The Moral Reasoning of Genetic Dilemmas Amongst Jewish Israeli Undergraduate Students with Different Religious Affiliations and Scientific Backgrounds.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Variables influencing pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Anne Hawkins; Ana Stenzel; Joanne Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Investigating Pregnancy Outcomes After Abnormal Cell-Free DNA Test Results.

Authors:  Jessica Lu; Devereux N Saller; Luanne M Fraer; Beatrice A Chen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Decision-Making after Prenatal Diagnosis of down Syndrome.

Authors:  Amy R Reed; Kathryn L Berrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic counseling for fetal abnormalities in a South African community.

Authors:  Caryn Todd; Tabitha Haw; Jennifer Kromberg; Arnold Christianson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Advances in medical technology and creation of disparities: the case of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Catherine De Vigan; Véronique Vodovar; Gérard Bréart; François Goffinet; Béatrice Blondel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The decision to continue a pregnancy affected by Down syndrome: timing of decision and satisfaction with receiving a prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Emily Hurford; Anne Hawkins; Louanne Hudgins; Joanne Taylor
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Decisions about testing and termination of pregnancy for different fetal conditions: a qualitative study of European White and Pakistani mothers of affected children.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Jenny Hewison; Josephine M Green; Howard S Cuckle; Janet Hirst; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Imagined futures: how experiential knowledge of disability affects parents' decision making about fetal abnormality.

Authors:  Emma F France; Louise Locock; Kate Hunt; Sue Ziebland; Kate Field; Sally Wyke
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Risk and reproductive decisions: British Pakistani couples' responses to genetic counselling.

Authors:  Alison Shaw
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.