Literature DB >> 11227939

Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopic and open surgeries for colorectal carcinoma.

K Nishiguchi1, J Okuda, M Toyoda, K Tanaka, N Tanigawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To objectively evaluate the benefits of laparoscopic procedures for colorectal carcinoma, a prospective study to measure the stress response to laparoscopic surgery (n = 15) compared with open surgery (n = 12) was undertaken. In addition, to compare the various parameters relevant to surgical stress, the major surgery group (transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma, n = 4; and left upper abdominal evisceration for gastric carcinoma, n = 3) was assigned.
METHODS: Peripheral blood samples were obtained to measure serum interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, peripheral leukocytes, and lymphocyte counts. Additionally, the level of lymphocyte apoptosis was quantified using flow cytometry.
RESULTS: The interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels were significantly greater in the open group than in the laparoscopy group one day (P < 0.05) and two days (P < 0.05) after surgery, respectively. In the laparoscopy group, lymphocyte counts were significantly higher than in the open group two days after surgery. The laparoscopy and open groups did not differ significantly in their lymphocyte apoptotic index. In the major surgery group, the apoptotic index was significantly higher than in either the laparoscopy group or the open group in the early postoperative period.
CONCLUSION: Changes in the various parameters pertinent to surgical stress evaluated in this study suggest that laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma leads to less postoperative stress than conventional open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11227939     DOI: 10.1007/bf02234297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  31 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Luca Gianotti; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Radaelli; Paola Gruarin; Paolo Dellabona; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Influence of major surgery on the mannan-binding lectin pathway of innate immunity.

Authors:  H Ytting; I J Christensen; L Basse; J Lykke; S Thiel; J C Jensenius; H J Nielsen
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Laparoscopic surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in incurable stage IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hideaki Nishigori; Masaaki Ito; Yuji Nishizawa; Atsushi Kohyama; Takamaru Koda; Kentaro Nakajima; Yusuke Nishizawa; Akihiro Kobayashi; Masanori Sugito; Norio Saito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A comparison of the complication rates between laparoscopic colectomy and laparoscopic low anterior resection.

Authors:  S Yamamoto; S Fujita; T Akasu; Y Moriya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Reduction of prolonged postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Yamamoto; S Fujita; T Akasu; K Uehara; Y Moriya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery.

Authors:  C A Sartori; A D'Annibale; G Cutini; C Senargiotto; D D'Antonio; A Dal Pozzo; M Fiorino; G Gagliardi; B Franzato; G Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  A soft pancreatic remnant is associated with increased drain fluid pancreatic amylase and serum CRP levels following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Yasuo Hayasidani; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Naoya Nakagawa; Hiroki Ohge; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Comparative evaluation of immune response after laparoscopical and open total mesorectal excisions with anal sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jian-Kun Hu; Zong-Guang Zhou; Zhi-Xin Chen; Lan-Lan Wang; Yong-Yang Yu; Jin Liu; Bo Zhang; Li Li; Ye Shu; Jia-Ping Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  R Veldkamp; M Gholghesaei; H J Bonjer; D W Meijer; M Buunen; J Jeekel; B Anderberg; M A Cuesta; A Cuschierl; A Fingerhut; J W Fleshman; P J Guillou; E Haglind; J Himpens; C A Jacobi; J J Jakimowicz; F Koeckerling; A M Lacy; E Lezoche; J R Monson; M Morino; E Neugebauer; S D Wexner; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: controversies part 1.

Authors:  Melanie Goldfarb; Steven Brower; S D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.