Literature DB >> 20174941

Short- and long-term costs of laparoscopic colectomy are significantly less than open colectomy.

David P Eisenberg1, Jane Wey, Philip Q Bao, Melissa Saul, Andrew R Watson, Wolfgang H Schraut, Kenneth K W Lee, A James Moser, Steven J Hughes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The financial impact of laparoscopic colectomy remains poorly defined. We report the short-term costs of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) as compared with open colectomy (OC) in a high-volume tertiary care hospital, and are the first to incorporate the costs of late, colectomy-related complications in an analysis of long-term costs.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic (n = 76) or open (n = 162) colon resection between January 2004 and December 2006 was performed. Primary endpoints were total hospital cost of the index admission and total hospital cost for any subsequent admission for treatment of a colectomy-related complication.
RESULTS: Two-hundred thirty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Mean total hospital cost was significantly greater for patients undergoing OC (US $17,686 per patient versus US $14,518, P = 0.0003). Mean total operative costs were equivalent (US $7,451 OC versus US $7,794 LC, P = 0.274). Average length of stay was shorter for LC (5.2 versus 6.9 days, P < 0.0001). Late complication rates were 5.6% (OC) and 2.6% (LC). Integrating the cost of late complications further increased the disparity between the total cost of OC (US $18,296 per patient, 3.4% increase) as compared with LC (US $14,789, 1.9% increase).
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate both short- and long-term financial benefits of LC in a high-volume tertiary care hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20174941     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0909-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

1.  Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Ravi P Kiran; Anthony J Senagore; Karen Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stefan Maartense; Michalda S Dunker; J Frederick Slors; Miguel A Cuesta; Dirk J Gouma; Sander J van Deventer; Ad A van Bodegraven; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Duepree; Anthony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore; Hans J Duepree; Conor P Delaney; Sharmilla Dissanaike; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma.

Authors:  Min-Hua Zheng; Bo Feng; Ai-Guo Lu; Jian-Wen Li; Ming-Liang Wang; Zhi-Hai Mao; Yan-Yan Hu; Feng Dong; Wei-Guo Hu; Dong-Hua Li; Lu Zang; Yuan-Fei Peng; Bao-Ming Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study.

Authors:  N Pokala; C P Delaney; A J Senagore; K M Brady; V W Fazio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Duepree; Anthony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  3 in total

1.  A cost comparison of laparoscopic and open colon surgery in a publicly funded academic institution.

Authors:  Krista M Hardy; Josephine Kwong; Kristen B Pitzul; Ashley S Vergis; Timothy D Jackson; David R Urbach; Allan Okrainec
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The impact of surgeon choices on costs associated with uncomplicated minimally invasive colectomy: you are not as important as you think.

Authors:  John Tillou; Deborah Nagle; Vitaliy Poylin; Thomas Cataldo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2017-09-27

3.  Laparoscopic versus an open colectomy in an emergency setting: a case-controlled study.

Authors:  Frederick H Koh; Ker-Kan Tan; Charles B Tsang; Dean C Koh
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2013-02-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.