Literature DB >> 12430828

Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: the effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility.

Jean C Krause1, Louis D Braida.   

Abstract

Sentences spoken "clearly" (and slowly) are significantly more intelligible than those spoken "conversationally" for hearing-impaired listeners in a variety of backgrounds [Picheny, Durlach, and Braida, J. Speech Hear. Res. 28, 96-103 (1985); Uchanski et al., J. Speech Hear. Res. 39, 494-509 (1996); Payton, Uchanski, and Braida, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1581-1592 (1994)]. However, it is unknown whether slower speaking rates are necessary for highly intelligible speech or whether an alternative form of clear speech exists at faster (i.e., normal) rates. To investigate this question, talkers with significant public speaking experience were asked to produce clear and conversational speech at slow, normal, and quick rates. A method for eliciting clear speech was introduced that ensured the clearest possible speech was obtained at each of these speaking rates. To probe for other highly intelligible speaking modes, talkers also recorded sentences in two other speaking modes: soft and loud. Intelligibility tests indicated that clear speech was the only speaking mode that provided a consistent intelligibility advantage over conversational speech. Moreover, the advantage of clear speech was extended to faster speaking rates than previously reported. These results suggest that clear speech has some inherent acoustic properties that contribute to its high intelligibility without altering rate. Identifying these acoustic properties could lead to improved signal-processing schemes for hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12430828     DOI: 10.1121/1.1509432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency non-native talkers and listeners: intelligibility and accentedness.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Intelligibility and acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech in telugu (a South Indian dravidian language).

Authors:  Naresh Durisala; S G R Prakash; Arivudai Nambi; Ridhima Batra
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-11

3.  Conversational and clear speech intelligibility of /bVd/ syllables produced by native and non-native English speakers.

Authors:  Catherine L Rogers; Teresa M DeMasi; Jean C Krause
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Yi-ping Chang; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to investigate the source of increased intelligibility in speakers with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Kris Tjaden; Alexander Kain; Jennifer Lam
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Evaluating the role of spectral and envelope characteristics in the intelligibility advantage of clear speech.

Authors:  Jean C Krause; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Temporal organization of English clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Comparison of a short-time speech-based intelligibility metric to the speech transmission index and intelligibility data.

Authors:  Karen L Payton; Mona Shrestha
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The maturation of human evoked brain potentials to sounds presented at different stimulus rates.

Authors:  E Sussman; M Steinschneider; V Gumenyuk; J Grushko; K Lawson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.