Literature DB >> 12418106

Determinants of the polyproline II helix from modeling studies.

Trevor P Creamer1, Margaret N Campbell.   

Abstract

Despite the fact that Tiffany and Krimm (1968a,b) formulated their hypothesis more than thirty years ago, it is only now that we are beginning to truly appreciate the importance of the PPII helical conformation. Recent experimental work has demonstrated that the polypeptide backbone possesses a significant propensity to adopt the PPII helical conformation (Kelly et al., 2001; Rucker and Creamer, 2002; Shi et al., 2002). The major determinant of this backbone propensity would appear to be backbone solvation, as was originally hinted at by Krimm and Tiffany (1974) and later suggested by a number of groups (Adzhubei and Sternberg, 1993; Sreerama and Woody, 1999; Kelly et al., 2001; Rucker and Creamer, 2002; Shi et al., 2002). The calculations and modeling described above provide data in support of this hypothesis. Each residue has its own propensity to adopt the PPII conformation, with the backbone propensity being modulated by the side chain (Kelly et al., 2001). Short, bulky side chains occlude backbone from solvent and thus disfavor the PPII conformation, while the lack of a side chain or long, flexible side chains tend to favor the conformation (Kelly et al., 2001). Again, the described calculations support this. Steric interactions (Pappu et al., 2000) and side chain conformational entropy alos contribute to the observed propensities. Furthermore, as suggested from surveys of PPII helices in proteins of known structure (Stapley and Creamer, 1999), side chain-to-backbone hydrogen bonds may well play a role in stabilizing PPII helices. The survey data, plus supporting calculations, also suggest that some polar residues may play a PPII helic-capping role analogous to that observed in alpha-helices (Presta and Rose, 1988; Aurora and Rose, 1998). Taken in sum, an atomic-level picture of the stabilization of PPII helices is beginning to emerge. Once the determinants of PPII helix formation are known in more detail, it will become possible to apply them, along with the known determinants of the alpha-helical conformation, to the understanding of protein unfolded states. If, as suggested at the beginning of this article, protein unfolded states are dominated by residues in the PPII and alpha-conformations, these data will allow for modeling of the unfolded state ensembles of specific proteins with a level of realism that has not been previously anticipated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12418106     DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3233(02)62010-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Protein Chem        ISSN: 0065-3233


  26 in total

1.  Malleable conformation of the elastic PEVK segment of titin: non-co-operative interconversion of polyproline II helix, beta-turn and unordered structures.

Authors:  Kan Ma; Kuan Wang
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Effects of phosphorylation on the intrinsic propensity of backbone conformations of serine/threonine.

Authors:  Erbin He; Guanghui Yan; Jian Zhang; Jun Wang; Wenfei Li
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 1.365

3.  Building native protein conformation from highly approximate backbone torsion angles.

Authors:  Haipeng Gong; Patrick J Fleming; George D Rose
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Unusual compactness of a polyproline type II structure.

Authors:  Bojan Zagrovic; Jan Lipfert; Eric J Sorin; Ian S Millett; Wilfred F van Gunsteren; Sebastian Doniach; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the GST-fused human Bri3 N-terminal domain.

Authors:  Qilu Ye; Vinay Kumar Singh; James Daniel Blonde; Zongchao Jia
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2004-10-30

Review 6.  Protein-solvent interactions.

Authors:  Ninad Prabhu; Kim Sharp
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Extrinsic interactions dominate helical propensity in coupled binding and folding of the lactose repressor protein hinge helix.

Authors:  Hongli Zhan; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen Shive Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Energetics of an n --> pi interaction that impacts protein structure.

Authors:  Jonathan A Hodges; Ronald T Raines
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 6.005

9.  Stereoelectronic effects on polyproline conformation.

Authors:  Jia-Cherng Horng; Ronald T Raines
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Stereoelectronic effects on the transition barrier of polyproline conformational interconversion.

Authors:  Yi-Chun Chiang; Yu-Ju Lin; Jia-Cherng Horng
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.