Literature DB >> 16669632

Extrinsic interactions dominate helical propensity in coupled binding and folding of the lactose repressor protein hinge helix.

Hongli Zhan1, Liskin Swint-Kruse, Kathleen Shive Matthews.   

Abstract

A significant number of eukaryotic regulatory proteins are predicted to have disordered regions. Many of these proteins bind DNA, which may serve as a template for protein folding. Similar behavior is seen in the prokaryotic LacI/GalR family of proteins that couple hinge-helix folding with DNA binding. These hinge regions form short alpha-helices when bound to DNA but appear to be disordered in other states. An intriguing question is whether and to what degree intrinsic helix propensity contributes to the function of these proteins. In addition to its interaction with operator DNA, the LacI hinge helix interacts with the hinge helix of the homodimer partner as well as to the surface of the inducer-binding domain. To explore the hierarchy of these interactions, we made a series of substitutions in the LacI hinge helix at position 52, the only site in the helix that does not interact with DNA and/or the inducer-binding domain. The substitutions at V52 have significant effects on operator binding affinity and specificity, and several substitutions also impair functional communication with the inducer-binding domain. Results suggest that helical propensity of amino acids in the hinge region alone does not dominate function; helix-helix packing interactions appear to also contribute. Further, the data demonstrate that variation in operator sequence can overcome side chain effects on hinge-helix folding and/or hinge-hinge interactions. Thus, this system provides a direct example whereby an extrinsic interaction (DNA binding) guides internal events that influence folding and functionality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16669632      PMCID: PMC2701349          DOI: 10.1021/bi052619p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  81 in total

1.  Plasticity in protein-DNA recognition: lac repressor interacts with its natural operator 01 through alternative conformations of its DNA-binding domain.

Authors:  Charalampos G Kalodimos; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Roberto K Salinas; Rainer Wechselberger; Rolf Boelens; Robert Kaptein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins.

Authors:  Monika Fuxreiter; István Simon; Peter Friedrich; Peter Tompa
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  A closer view of the conformation of the Lac repressor bound to operator.

Authors:  C E Bell; M Lewis
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-03

4.  Operator DNA sequence variation enhances high affinity binding by hinge helix mutants of lactose repressor protein.

Authors:  C M Falcon; K S Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 5.  Lactose repressor protein: functional properties and structure.

Authors:  K S Matthews; J C Nichols
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  1998

6.  A double-filter method for nitrocellulose-filter binding: application to protein-nucleic acid interactions.

Authors:  I Wong; T M Lohman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Structural studies of protein-nucleic acid interactions.

Authors:  D H Ohlendorf; B W Matthews
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng       Date:  1983

Review 8.  Amino acid, peptide, and protein volume in solution.

Authors:  A A Zamyatnin
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng       Date:  1984

9.  The quorum-sensing transcriptional regulator TraR requires its cognate signaling ligand for protein folding, protease resistance, and dimerization.

Authors:  J Zhu; S C Winans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Escherichia coli purine repressor: key residues for the allosteric transition between active and inactive conformations and for interdomain signaling.

Authors:  F Lu; R G Brennan; H Zalkin
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and Disorder in Gene Regulation: LacI/GalR and Hox Proteins.

Authors:  Sarah E Bondos; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen S Matthews
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Functional consequences of exchanging domains between LacI and PurR are mediated by the intervening linker sequence.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Susan M Egan; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-07-01

3.  Mechanics of DNA bridging by bacterial condensin MukBEF in vitro and in singulo.

Authors:  Zoya M Petrushenko; Yuanbo Cui; Weifeng She; Valentin V Rybenkov
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  In vivo tests of thermodynamic models of transcription repressor function.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Harlyn Skinner; Hongli Zhan; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Dorothy Beckett
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Homolog comparisons further reconcile in vitro and in vivo correlations of protein activities by revealing over-looked physiological factors.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Kristen M Schwingen; Joshua J Riepe; Chamitha J Weeramange; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Mispair-specific recruitment of the Mlh1-Pms1 complex identifies repair substrates of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh3 complex.

Authors:  Anjana Srivatsan; Nikki Bowen; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Using Evolution to Guide Protein Engineering: The Devil IS in the Details.

Authors:  Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  The strengths and limitations of using biolayer interferometry to monitor equilibrium titrations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Chamitha J Weeramange; Max S Fairlamb; Dipika Singh; Aron W Fenton; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Ligand-induced conformational changes and conformational dynamics in the solution structure of the lactose repressor protein.

Authors:  Marc Taraban; Hongli Zhan; Andrew E Whitten; David B Langley; Kathleen S Matthews; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Jill Trewhella
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Experimental identification of specificity determinants in the domain linker of a LacI/GalR protein: bioinformatics-based predictions generate true positives and false negatives.

Authors:  Sarah Meinhardt; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.