Literature DB >> 12413976

Progress we can be proud of: U.S. trends in assisted reproduction over the first 20 years.

James P Toner1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Documentation of the significant progress of assisted reproductive technology (ART) therapy in the United States.
DESIGN: Tabulation of data from the annual published reports of ART activity in the United States for the years 1985 through 1999.
SETTING: ART centers in the United States that report their results to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) via the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). PATIENT(S): The annual reports included 647,208 cycles of treatment. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The number of clinics and cycles, and the rates of pregnancy, delivery, miscarriage, and multiple pregnancy were examined. Practice trends were also examined. RESULT(S): The number of clinics and cycles has grown steadily. The 155,661 clinical pregnancies led to 128,608 births and 177,745 babies born. The advent of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and the fall of GIFT and zygote intrafallopian transfer (ZIFT) are noted. Pregnancy rates have risen steadily in all therapies, and the number of deliveries of triplets or more has declined dramatically in the most recent reporting years. CONCLUSION(S): Over the years, ART therapies have steadily become more effective, with notable reductions in multiple pregnancies, the ability to avoid laparoscopy (for egg retrieval and in some cases tubal transfers), and effective therapy for serious sperm, egg, and uterine problems, none of which was true in the early years. This has occurred owing to the dedication and ingenuity of practitioners, and, notably, without federal regulation of clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12413976     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04197-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  15 in total

1.  Accreditation, supervision, and regulation of ART clinics in India--a distant dream?

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia; Kulvinder Kaur
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  An opinion on regulating the assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Don P Wolf
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of day 5 morphology grading and metabolomic Viability Score on predicting implantation outcome.

Authors:  Emre Seli; Can Bruce; Lucy Botros; Mark Henson; Pieter Roos; Kevin Judge; Thorir Hardarson; Aishling Ahlström; Paul Harrison; Michael Henman; Kathryn Go; Nicole Acevedo; Jeannette Siques; Michael Tucker; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Conversion from assisted reproductive technology to intrauterine insemination in low responders: is it advantageous?

Authors:  John M Norian; Eric D Levens; Kevin S Richter; Eric A Widra; Michael J Levy
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Metabolic imaging with the use of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) accurately detects mitochondrial dysfunction in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Tim Sanchez; Tianren Wang; Marta Venturas Pedro; Man Zhang; Ecem Esencan; Denny Sakkas; Dan Needleman; Emre Seli
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Epidemiologic Approaches for Studying Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Design, Methods, Analysis and Interpretation.

Authors:  Carmen Messerlian; Audrey J Gaskins
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2017-04-17

7.  Multiplexed detection and the establishment of a novel high-throughput method for human germ cell quality screening based on aggregation-induced emission.

Authors:  Zixuan Zeng; Xiaojiao Ren; Tailang Yin; Xiang Gao; Mengting Tsai; Yi Zhang; Meijia Gu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

8.  Development and evaluation of inexpensive automated deep learning-based imaging systems for embryology.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy; Prudhvi Thirumalaraju; Charles L Bormann; Hemanth Kandula; Irene Dimitriadis; Irene Souter; Vinish Yogesh; Sandeep Kota Sai Pavan; Divyank Yarravarapu; Raghav Gupta; Rohan Pooniwala; Hadi Shafiee
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  Epidemiology of obstetric-related ICU admissions in Maryland: 1999-2008*.

Authors:  Jonathan P Wanderer; Lisa R Leffert; Jill M Mhyre; Elena V Kuklina; William M Callaghan; Brian T Bateman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Metabolomics and its application for non-invasive embryo assessment in IVF.

Authors:  Lucy Botros; Denny Sakkas; Emre Seli
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.