Literature DB >> 20171626

Conversion from assisted reproductive technology to intrauterine insemination in low responders: is it advantageous?

John M Norian1, Eric D Levens, Kevin S Richter, Eric A Widra, Michael J Levy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine cycle outcomes among patients demonstrating an attenuated ovarian response that proceeded to oocyte retrieval to those converted to intrauterine insemination (IUI).
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Large private fertility center. PATIENT(S): First planned autologous assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles among women demonstrating a poor ovarian response to hyperstimulation (≤4 follicles≥14 mm, peak E2<1,000 IU/L at hCG administration). INTERVENTION(S): Oocyte retrieval or IUI conversion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth and clinical pregnancy. RESULT(S): A total of 269 IUI conversions and 167 oocyte retrievals followed a poor ovarian response to gonadotropins among first planned ART cycles. Number of follicles≥14 mm (2.3 vs. 3.5) and peak E2 levels (555 vs. 743 pg/mL) were lower for IUI conversions compared with those proceeding to ART. Peak E2 was similar between groups after adjusting for follicle number (IUI: 611 pg/mL; ART: 652 pg/mL). Stimulation response was similar between treatment groups with equivalent follicle numbers. Undergoing oocyte retrieval was associated with significantly improved pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-7.4) and live birth outcome (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-8.0) after adjusting for age and follicle number. CONCLUSION(S): Among women demonstrating a poor ovarian response to gonadotropins, proceeding with planned ART resulted in significantly higher pregnancy rates than converting these cycles to IUI. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20171626      PMCID: PMC3013350          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  15 in total

1.  Progress we can be proud of: U.S. trends in assisted reproduction over the first 20 years.

Authors:  James P Toner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Poor responders to ovulation induction: is proceeding to in-vitro fertilization worthwhile?

Authors:  H Lashen; W Ledger; A Lopez-Bernal; D Barlow
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Converting an IVF cycle to IUI in low responders with at least 2 follicles.

Authors:  Roberto Matorras; Beatriz Corcóstegui; Rosario Mendoza; Olga Ramón; Victoria Aparicio; Maria Teresa Uriarte; Francisco J Rodríguez-Escudero
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Optimal treatment for poor responders to ovarian stimulation: does in vitro insemination offer any advantages to intrauterine insemination?

Authors:  Simon Wood; Razrim Rahim; Tom Searle; Yasmin Sajjad; Stephen Troup; Iwan Lewis-Jones; Charles Kingsland
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.767

5.  The outcome of IVF-embryo transfer treatment in patients who develop three follicles or less.

Authors:  M M Biljan; W M Buckett; N Dean; S J Phillips; S L Tan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Outcome of in vitro fertilization in women with low response to ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  A Pellicer; A Lightman; M P Diamond; J B Russell; A H DeCherney
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Conception rates following assisted reproduction in poor responder patients: a retrospective study in 300 consecutive cycles.

Authors:  Ulun Ulug; Izhar Ben-Shlomo; Ersadik Turan; Halit Firat Erden; Mehmet Ali Akman; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Prognostic assessment of female fecundity.

Authors:  D Navot; Z Rosenwaks; E J Margalioth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-09-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 are predictive of in vitro fertilization outcome.

Authors:  R T Scott; J P Toner; S J Muasher; S Oehninger; S Robinson; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice.

Authors:  Robert J Stillman; Kevin S Richter; Nicole K Banks; James R Graham
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing continuation of assisted reproductive technology with conversion to intrauterine insemination in patients with low follicle numbers.

Authors:  Bo Yu; Sunni Mumford; G Donald Royster; James Segars; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Prognostic factors in intrauterine insemination cycles.

Authors:  Fernanda Sicchieri; Aline Bomfim Silva; Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa E Silva; Paula Andrea de Albuquerque Sales Navarro; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Rosana Maria Dos Reis
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  ConFIRM trial - conversion of in vitro fertilization cycles to intrauterine inseminations in patients with a poor ovarian response to stimulation: a protocol for a multicentric, prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Léa Delbos; Elsa Parot-Schinkel; Hady El Hachem; Guillaume Legendre; Philippe Descamps; Lisa Boucret; Véronique Ferré-L'Hotellier; Pauline Jeanneteau; Cécile Dreux; Catherine Morinière; Pascale May-Panloup; Pierre-Emmanuel Bouet
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.