Tim Sanchez1, Tianren Wang2, Marta Venturas Pedro1, Man Zhang2, Ecem Esencan2, Denny Sakkas3, Dan Needleman1, Emre Seli4. 1. Departments of Applied Physics and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Boston IVF, Waltham, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: emre.seli@yale.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether metabolic imaging with the use of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) identifies metabolic differences between normal oocytes and those with metabolic dysfunction. DESIGN: Experimental study. SETTING: Academic research laboratories. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): Oocytes from mice with global knockout of Clpp (caseinolytic peptidase P; n = 52) were compared with wild-type (WT) oocytes (n = 55) as a model of severe oocyte dysfunction. Oocytes from old mice (1 year old; n = 29) were compared with oocytes from young mice (12 weeks old; n = 35) as a model of mild oocyte dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): FLIM was used to measure the naturally occurring nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase (NADH) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) autofluorescence in individual oocytes. Eight metabolic parameters were obtained from each measurement (4 per fluorophore): short (τ1) and long (τ2) fluorescence lifetime, fluorescence intensity (I), and fraction of the molecule engaged with enzyme (F). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and blastocyst development rates were measured to assess illumination safety. RESULT(S): In Clpp-knockout oocytes compared with WT, FAD τ1 and τ2 were longer and I was higher, NADH τ2 was longer, and F was lower. In old oocytes compared with young ones, FAD τ1 was longer and I was lower, NADH τ1 and τ2 were shorter, and I and F were lower. FLIM did not affect ROS levels or blastocyst development rates. CONCLUSION(S): FLIM parameters exhibit strong differentiation between Clpp-knockout versus WT, and old versus young oocytes. FLIM could potentially be used as a noninvasive tool to assess mitochondrial function in oocytes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether metabolic imaging with the use of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) identifies metabolic differences between normal oocytes and those with metabolic dysfunction. DESIGN: Experimental study. SETTING: Academic research laboratories. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): Oocytes from mice with global knockout of Clpp (caseinolytic peptidase P; n = 52) were compared with wild-type (WT) oocytes (n = 55) as a model of severe oocyte dysfunction. Oocytes from old mice (1 year old; n = 29) were compared with oocytes from young mice (12 weeks old; n = 35) as a model of mild oocyte dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): FLIM was used to measure the naturally occurring nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase (NADH) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) autofluorescence in individual oocytes. Eight metabolic parameters were obtained from each measurement (4 per fluorophore): short (τ1) and long (τ2) fluorescence lifetime, fluorescence intensity (I), and fraction of the molecule engaged with enzyme (F). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and blastocyst development rates were measured to assess illumination safety. RESULT(S): In Clpp-knockout oocytes compared with WT, FAD τ1 and τ2 were longer and I was higher, NADH τ2 was longer, and F was lower. In old oocytes compared with young ones, FAD τ1 was longer and I was lower, NADH τ1 and τ2 were shorter, and I and F were lower. FLIM did not affect ROS levels or blastocyst development rates. CONCLUSION(S): FLIM parameters exhibit strong differentiation between Clpp-knockout versus WT, and old versus young oocytes. FLIM could potentially be used as a noninvasive tool to assess mitochondrial function in oocytes.
Authors: T Hassold; M Abruzzo; K Adkins; D Griffin; M Merrill; E Millie; D Saker; J Shen; M Zaragoza Journal: Environ Mol Mutagen Date: 1996 Impact factor: 3.216
Authors: Emre Seli; Maria D Lalioti; Sean M Flaherty; Denny Sakkas; Nihal Terzi; Joan A Steitz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-01-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Suzana Gispert; Dajana Parganlija; Michael Klinkenberg; Stefan Dröse; Ilka Wittig; Michel Mittelbronn; Pawel Grzmil; Sebastian Koob; Andrea Hamann; Michael Walter; Finja Büchel; Thure Adler; Martin Hrabé de Angelis; Dirk H Busch; Andreas Zell; Andreas S Reichert; Ulrich Brandt; Heinz D Osiewacz; Marina Jendrach; Georg Auburger Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Tim Sanchez; Marta Venturas; S Ali Aghvami; Xingbo Yang; Seth Fraden; Denny Sakkas; Daniel J Needleman Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Susanna Apter; Thomas Ebner; Thomas Freour; Yves Guns; Borut Kovacic; Nathalie Le Clef; Monica Marques; Marcos Meseguer; Debbie Montjean; Ioannis Sfontouris; Roger Sturmey; Giovanni Coticchio Journal: Hum Reprod Open Date: 2020-03-19