Literature DB >> 26717804

Spatial Language and the Embedded Listener Model in Parents' Input to Children.

Katrina Ferrara1, Malena Silva1, Colin Wilson1, Barbara Landau1.   

Abstract

Language is a collaborative act: To communicate successfully, speakers must generate utterances that are not only semantically valid but also sensitive to the knowledge state of the listener. Such sensitivity could reflect the use of an "embedded listener model," where speakers choose utterances on the basis of an internal model of the listener's conceptual and linguistic knowledge. In this study, we ask whether parents' spatial descriptions incorporate an embedded listener model that reflects their children's understanding of spatial relations and spatial terms. Adults described the positions of targets in spatial arrays to their children or to the adult experimenter. Arrays were designed so that targets could not be identified unless spatial relationships within the array were encoded and described. Parents of 3-4-year-old children encoded relationships in ways that were well-matched to their children's level of spatial language. These encodings differed from those of the same relationships in speech to the adult experimenter (Experiment 1). In contrast, parents of individuals with severe spatial impairments (Williams syndrome) did not show clear evidence of sensitivity to their children's level of spatial language (Experiment 2). The results provide evidence for an embedded listener model in the domain of spatial language and indicate conditions under which the ability to model listener knowledge may be more challenging.
Copyright © 2015 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audience design; Embedded listener model; Parental input; Spatial development; Spatial language

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26717804      PMCID: PMC4930431          DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  35 in total

1.  Using spatial terms to select an object.

Authors:  L A Carlson; G D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

2.  On language 'utility': processing complexity and communicative efficiency.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Harry Tily
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11-18

3.  Talking to children matters: early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary.

Authors:  Adriana Weisleder; Anne Fernald
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-09-10

4.  Knowing where things are in the second year of life: implications for hippocampal development.

Authors:  Julia Sluzenski; Nora S Newcombe; Eric Satlow
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Children's spatial thinking: does talk about the spatial world matter?

Authors:  Shannon M Pruden; Susan C Levine; Janellen Huttenlocher
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-10-04

Review 6.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

7.  Object recognition with severe spatial deficits in Williams syndrome: sparing and breakdown.

Authors:  Barbara Landau; James E Hoffman; Nicole Kurz
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-09-26

8.  The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish.

Authors:  J R Johnston; D I Slobin
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1979-10

9.  Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention.

Authors:  G D Logan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Is it only humans that count from left to right?

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Debbie M Kelly; Izabela Szelest; Lucia Regolin; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.