Literature DB >> 11138763

Listeners as co-narrators.

J B Bavelas1, L Coates, T Johnson.   

Abstract

A collaborative theory of narrative story-telling was tested in two experiments that examined what listeners do and their effect on the narrator. In 63 unacquainted dyads (81 women and 45 men), a narrator told his or her own close-call story. The listeners made 2 different kinds of listener responses: Generic responses included nodding and vocalizations such as "mhm." Specific responses, such as wincing or exclaiming, were tightly connected to (and served to illustrate) what the narrator was saying at the moment. In experimental conditions that distracted listeners from the narrative content, listeners made fewer responses, especially specific ones, and the narrators also told their stories significantly less well, particularly at what should have been the dramatic ending. Thus, listeners were co-narrators both through their own specific responses, which helped illustrate the story, and in their apparent effect on the narrator's performance. The results demonstrate the importance of moment-by-moment collaboration in face-to-face dialogue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11138763     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  31 in total

1.  Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices.

Authors:  Calion B Lockridge; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

Review 2.  Language in dialogue: when confederates might be hazardous to your data.

Authors:  Anna K Kuhlen; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

3.  Facing the Language-Memory Problem in the Study of Autobiographical Memory.

Authors:  Eleonora Bartoli; Andrea Smorti
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2019-09

4.  How retellings shape younger and older adults' memories.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Mara Mather
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-04

5.  Conversational synchrony in the communicative interactions of individuals with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Rupa Gupta Gordon; Arianna Rigon; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 6.  What is Functional Communication? A Theoretical Framework for Real-World Communication Applied to Aphasia Rehabilitation.

Authors:  W J Doedens; L Meteyard
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Interference in the shared-Stroop task: a comparison of self- and other-monitoring.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Janet F McLean; Chiara Gambi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.653

8.  Analyzing nonverbal listener responses using parallel recordings of multiple listeners.

Authors:  Iwan de Kok; Dirk Heylen
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-02-19

9.  The MPI facial expression database--a validated database of emotional and conversational facial expressions.

Authors:  Kathrin Kaulard; Douglas W Cunningham; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Content-specific coordination of listeners' to speakers' EEG during communication.

Authors:  Anna K Kuhlen; Carsten Allefeld; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.