Literature DB >> 9057305

The influence of surface atmospheric conditions on the range and area reached by animal vocalizations.

D Larom1, M Garstang, K Payne, R Raspet, M Lindeque.   

Abstract

Low-level vertical changes in temperature and wind exert powerful and predictable influences on the area ensonified by animal vocalizations. Computer modelling of low-frequency sound propagation in measured atmospheric conditions predicts that the calls of the savanna elephant at these frequencies can have ranges exceeding 10 km and that the calls will be highly directional in the presence of wind shear. Calling area is maximized under temperature inversions with low wind speeds. Calling area changes substantially over 24 h periods; on any given day, the calling area undergoes an expansion and contraction which may be as large as one order of magnitude. This cycle is modulated by topography, regional weather patterns, seasonality and possibly by climate variation. Similar influences affect the somewhat higher-frequency calls of lions and may be a selective pressure towards their crepuscular and nocturnal calling behaviour. Coyotes and wolves, which also live in areas with strong and prevalent nocturnal temperature inversions, show similar calling patterns, maximizing their chances of being heard over the longest possible distances. The pronounced dawn and evening vocalization peaks in other animals including birds, frogs and insects may reflect the same influences in combination with other factors which selectively limit high-frequency sound propagation. Atmospheric conditions therefore need to be taken into account in many field studies of animal behaviour. A simplified method for estimating sound propagation during field studies is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9057305     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.200.3.421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  12 in total

Review 1.  Long-distance, low-frequency elephant communication.

Authors:  Michael Garstang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Sound amplification by means of a horn-like roosting structure in Spix's disc-winged bat.

Authors:  Gloriana Chaverri; Erin H Gillam
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sound transmission and directional hearing in field crickets: neurophysiological studies outdoors.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kostarakos; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Vocalisations of wild common marmosets are influenced by diurnal and ontogenetic factors.

Authors:  Bruna Martins Bezerra; Antonio da Silva Souto; Maria Adélia Borstelmann de Oliveira; Lewis George Halsey
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather.

Authors:  Thierry Lengagne; Peter J B Slater
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Adapted to roar: functional morphology of tiger and lion vocal folds.

Authors:  Sarah A Klemuk; Tobias Riede; Edward J Walsh; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Age related decline in female lar gibbon great call performance suggests that call features correlate with physical condition.

Authors:  Thomas A Terleph; S Malaivijitnond; U H Reichard
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Booming far: the long-range vocal strategy of a lekking bird.

Authors:  C Cornec; Y Hingrat; T Aubin; F Rybak
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Deer browsing alters sound propagation in temperate deciduous forests.

Authors:  Timothy J Boycott; Jingyi Gao; Megan D Gall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Understanding Animal Detection of Precursor Earthquake Sounds.

Authors:  Michael Garstang; Michael C Kelley
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.