Literature DB >> 12395493

Mechanisms of same/different abstract-concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Jeffrey S Katz1, Anthony A Wright, Jocelyne Bachevalier.   

Abstract

Experiments with 9 rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) showed, for the first time, that abstract-concept learning varied with the training stimulus set size. In a same/different task, monkeys required to touch a top picture before choosing a bottom picture (same) or white rectangle (different) learned rapidly. Monkeys not required to touch the top picture or presented with the top picture for a fixed time learned slowly or not at all. No abstract-concept learning occurred after 8-item training but progressively improved with larger set sizes and was complete following 128-item training. A control monkey with a constant 8-item set ruled out repeated training and testing. Contrary to the unique-species account, it is argued that different species have quantitative, not qualitative, differences in abstract-concept learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12395493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  38 in total

1.  Optimal inference of sameness.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Michael Vogel; Kresimir Josic; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Relational learning in a context of transposition: a review.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Monitoring same/different discrimination behavior in time and space: finding differences and anticipatory discrimination behavior.

Authors:  Daniel I Brooks; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

4.  Transposition in pigeons: reassessing Spence (1937) with multiple discrimination training.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman; Michael E Young
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Identity matching-to-sample with olfactory stimuli in rats.

Authors:  Tracy Peña; Raymond C Pitts; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Successive odor matching- and non-matching-to-sample in rats: A reversal design.

Authors:  Katherine Bruce; Katherine Dyer; Michael Mathews; Catharine Nealley; Tiffany Phasukkan; Ashley Prichard; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Individual differences: either relational learning or item-specific learning in a same/different task.

Authors:  L Caitlin Elmore; Anthony A Wright; Jacquelyne J Rivera; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Abstract-concept learning carryover effects from the initial training set in pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Tamo Nakamura; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz; Kent D Bodily; Bradley R Sturz
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Domain is a moving target for relational learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Bradley R Sturz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Serial position functions following selective hippocampal lesions in monkeys: effects of delays and interference.

Authors:  Jocelyne Bachevalier; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.