Literature DB >> 9884932

Improving accuracy of bone resections using robotics tool holder and a high speed milling cutting tool.

M Fadda1, M Marcacci, S Toksvig-Larsen, T Wang, R Meneghello.   

Abstract

The use of non-cemented prosthetic components in implant surgery is demanding a high quality of bone beds in order to allow for a good level of osseointegration. Two parameters are significant in the evaluation of the quality of the host bone: roughness, which reports on the presence of gaps and peeks, and flatness, which reports on the total percentage of bone which lies in a given interval from the prosthesis. Robot assisted cutting of 32 pig femours and tibiae was performed using various techniques and options. This paper demonstrates roughness and flatness can be taken of the order of the limits necessary for osseointegration, by using a milling cutting tool mounted on a strong support, in this case a robot arm, improving on the results obtained by similar studies referred to hand sawed bones by 10 times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9884932     DOI: 10.3109/03091909809010012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Eng Technol        ISSN: 0309-1902


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current opinion on computer-aided surgical navigation and robotics: role in the treatment of sports-related injuries.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Anton Plakseychuk; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Robotically driven interventions: a method of using CT fluoroscopy without radiation exposure to the physician.

Authors:  Stephen B Solomon; Alexandru Patriciu; Mark E Bohlman; Louis R Kavoussi; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA.

Authors:  Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon; Ji-Hyeon Yim; Nathan A Netravali; William L Bargar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon; Sang-Jin Park; Woo Bin Jung; Hyeong-Won Park; Geon Woo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  No Benefit to Sensor-guided Balancing Compared With Freehand Balancing in TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Nana O Sarpong; Michael B Held; Matthew J Grosso; Carl L Herndon; Walkania Santos; Akshay Lakra; Roshan P Shah; H John Cooper; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  A perspective on robotic assistance for knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nathan A Netravali; Feimo Shen; Youngbae Park; William L Bargar
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-30

7.  Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study.

Authors:  Ola L A Harrysson; Yasser A Hosni; Jamal F Nayfeh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  How 3D patient-specific instruments improve accuracy of pelvic bone tumour resection in a cadaveric study.

Authors:  A Sallent; M Vicente; M M Reverté; A Lopez; A Rodríguez-Baeza; M Pérez-Domínguez; R Velez
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Cruciate-Retaining Implant: A 10-Year Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Hong Yeol Yang; Jong Keun Seon; Young Joo Shin; Hong An Lim; Eun Kyoo Song
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-05-08

Review 10.  The current state of robotics in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre St Mart; En Lin Goh
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-04-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.