Literature DB >> 12368470

Folding free energy function selects native-like protein sequences in the core but not on the surface.

Alfonso Jaramillo1, Lorenz Wernisch, Stéphanie Héry, Shoshana J Wodak.   

Abstract

An automatic protein design procedure is used to select amino acid sequences that optimize the folding free energy function for a given protein. The only information used in designing the sequences is a set of known backbone structures for each protein, a rotamer library, and a well established classical empirical force field, which relies on basic physical chemical principles that underlie molecular interactions and protein stability, and has not been adjusted to yield native-like sequences. Applying the procedure to 7 different known protein folds, representing a total of 45 different native protein structures, yields ensembles of designed sequences displaying remarkable similarity to their natural counterparts in the protein core, but which are distinctly non-native on the protein surface. We show that natural and designed sequences for a given fold score significantly higher than random sequences against profiles derived from both, designed and natural sequence ensembles. Furthermore, we find that designed sequence profiles can be used to retrieve the native sequences for many of the analyzed proteins using standard PSI-BLAST searches in sequence databases. These findings may have important implications for our understanding the selection pressures operating on natural protein sequences and hold promise for improving fold recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12368470      PMCID: PMC129712          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.212068599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  37 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Branch-and-terminate: a combinatorial optimization algorithm for protein design.

Authors:  D B Gordon; S L Mayo
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Prediction of amino acid sequence from structure.

Authors:  K Raha; A M Wollacott; M J Italia; J R Desjarlais
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins.

Authors:  H Frauenfelder; S G Sligar; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Interactions of proteins with RNA and DNA.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL.

Authors:  A Bairoch; R Apweiler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Profile analysis.

Authors:  M Gribskov; R Lüthy; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.600

10.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes.

Authors:  J W Ponder; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  19 in total

1.  Computational protein design is a challenge for implicit solvation models.

Authors:  Alfonso Jaramillo; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Energy functions for protein design I: efficient and accurate continuum electrostatics and solvation.

Authors:  Navin Pokala; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  A knowledge-based potential highlights unique features of membrane α-helical and β-barrel protein insertion and folding.

Authors:  Daniel Hsieh; Alexander Davis; Vikas Nanda
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Protein misinteraction avoidance causes highly expressed proteins to evolve slowly.

Authors:  Jian-Rong Yang; Ben-Yang Liao; Shi-Mei Zhuang; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Computational prediction of native protein ligand-binding and enzyme active site sequences.

Authors:  Raj Chakrabarti; Alexander M Klibanov; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Systematic optimization model and algorithm for binding sequence selection in computational enzyme design.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Huang; Kehang Han; Yushan Zhu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Computational protein design: validation and possible relevance as a tool for homology searching and fold recognition.

Authors:  Marcel Schmidt Am Busch; Audrey Sedano; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  PROTDES: CHARMM toolbox for computational protein design.

Authors:  María Suárez; Pablo Tortosa; Alfonso Jaramillo
Journal:  Syst Synth Biol       Date:  2009-07-02

Review 9.  Enzyme informatics.

Authors:  Rosanna G Alderson; Luna De Ferrari; Lazaros Mavridis; James L McDonagh; John B O Mitchell; Neetika Nath
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  A computational framework to empower probabilistic protein design.

Authors:  Menachem Fromer; Chen Yanover
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.