Literature DB >> 23116471

Enzyme informatics.

Rosanna G Alderson1, Luna De Ferrari, Lazaros Mavridis, James L McDonagh, John B O Mitchell, Neetika Nath.   

Abstract

Over the last 50 years, sequencing, structural biology and bioinformatics have completely revolutionised biomolecular science, with millions of sequences and tens of thousands of three dimensional structures becoming available. The bioinformatics of enzymes is well served by, mostly free, online databases. BRENDA describes the chemistry, substrate specificity, kinetics, preparation and biological sources of enzymes, while KEGG is valuable for understanding enzymes and metabolic pathways. EzCatDB, SFLD and MACiE are key repositories for data on the chemical mechanisms by which enzymes operate. At the current rate of genome sequencing and manual annotation, human curation will never finish the functional annotation of the ever-expanding list of known enzymes. Hence there is an increasing need for automated annotation, though it is not yet widespread for enzyme data. In contrast, functional ontologies such as the Gene Ontology already profit from automation. Despite our growing understanding of enzyme structure and dynamics, we are only beginning to be able to design novel enzymes. One can now begin to trace the functional evolution of enzymes using phylogenetics. The ability of enzymes to perform secondary functions, albeit relatively inefficiently, gives clues as to how enzyme function evolves. Substrate promiscuity in enzymes is one example of imperfect specificity in protein-ligand interactions. Similarly, most drugs bind to more than one protein target. This may sometimes result in helpful polypharmacology as a drug modulates plural targets, but also often leads to adverse side-effects. Many chemoinformatics approaches can be used to model the interactions between druglike molecules and proteins in silico. We can even use quantum chemical techniques like DFT and QM/MM to compute the structural and energetic course of enzyme catalysed chemical reaction mechanisms, including a full description of bond making and breaking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23116471      PMCID: PMC3605803          DOI: 10.2174/156802612804547353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem        ISSN: 1568-0266            Impact factor:   3.295


  116 in total

1.  The KEGG databases and tools facilitating omics analysis: latest developments involving human diseases and pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Masaaki Kotera; Mika Hirakawa; Toshiaki Tokimatsu; Susumu Goto; Minoru Kanehisa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

2.  Direct calculation of electron density in density-functional theory.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1991-03-18       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 3.  Protein dynamics and enzyme catalysis: insights from simulations.

Authors:  John D McGeagh; Kara E Ranaghan; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-12-15

4.  Complementary new approaches enable repositioning of failed drug candidates.

Authors:  Louis A Tartaglia
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.206

5.  Density-functional theory of the electronic structure of molecules.

Authors:  R G Parr; W Yang
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.703

6.  Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes.

Authors:  David Croft; Gavin O'Kelly; Guanming Wu; Robin Haw; Marc Gillespie; Lisa Matthews; Michael Caudy; Phani Garapati; Gopal Gopinath; Bijay Jassal; Steven Jupe; Irina Kalatskaya; Shahana Mahajan; Bruce May; Nelson Ndegwa; Esther Schmidt; Veronica Shamovsky; Christina Yung; Ewan Birney; Henning Hermjakob; Peter D'Eustachio; Lincoln Stein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Predicting the mechanism of phospholipidosis.

Authors:  Robert Lowe; Hamse Y Mussa; Florian Nigsch; Robert C Glen; John Bo Mitchell
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 5.514

8.  Exploring the evolution of novel enzyme functions within structurally defined protein superfamilies.

Authors:  Nicholas Furnham; Ian Sillitoe; Gemma L Holliday; Alison L Cuff; Roman A Laskowski; Christine A Orengo; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Manual GO annotation of predictive protein signatures: the InterPro approach to GO curation.

Authors:  Sarah Burge; Elizabeth Kelly; David Lonsdale; Prudence Mutowo-Muellenet; Craig McAnulla; Alex Mitchell; Amaia Sangrador-Vegas; Siew-Yit Yong; Nicola Mulder; Sarah Hunter
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 10.  Characterizing the complexity of enzymes on the basis of their mechanisms and structures with a bio-computational analysis.

Authors:  Gemma L Holliday; Julia D Fischer; John B O Mitchell; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 5.542

View more
  2 in total

1.  Synthetic Biology Meets Machine Learning.

Authors:  Brendan Fu-Long Sieow; Ryan De Sotto; Zhi Ren Darren Seet; In Young Hwang; Matthew Wook Chang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2023

2.  One origin for metallo-β-lactamase activity, or two? An investigation assessing a diverse set of reconstructed ancestral sequences based on a sample of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Rosanna G Alderson; Daniel Barker; John B O Mitchell
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.395

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.