Literature DB >> 12235613

Systematic review for the early prediction of motor and functional outcome after stroke by using motor-evoked potentials.

Henk T Hendricks1, Machiel J Zwarts, Erik F Plat, Jacques van Limbeek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in predicting motor and functional outcomes after acute stroke. DATA SOURCES: A computer-aided search to identify original prognostic studies published from 1988 through 2000; relevant references cited in the retrieved articles were also included. STUDY SELECTION: A preliminary screening selected studies in which transcranial magnetic stimulation was assessed as a prognostic determinant for outcome at the level of impairments (motor recovery) and disabilities (functional recovery). The studies were then subjected to a critical review according to a priori methodologic criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from the studies were used to construct contingency tables with MEPs as a prognostic determinant. The distribution of cells was statistically assessed with the Fisher exact test. The prognostic test properties were expressed as sensitivity and specificity. The clinical significance was determined by odds ratios. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 85 potentially relevant studies, 20 met the criteria for the preliminary screening; after the critical review, 5 studies were included for analysis and discussion.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the data from the 5 studies indicated obvious evidence for the prognostic value of MEPs for both motor and functional recovery. The prognostic test properties for subgroups of patients could be established. In predicting motor recovery of the upper extremity, the specificity was consistently very high for subgroups of patients with paralysis or severe paresis; this test property might be used in clinical practice. We discuss the prognostic value of MEPs and offer suggestions for further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12235613     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.34284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  24 in total

1.  A combined therapeutic approach in stroke rehabilitation: A review on non-invasive brain stimulation plus pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Carolina Perez; Leon Morales-Quezada; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Int J Neurorehabil       Date:  2014-11-15

Review 2.  Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Pino; Giovanni Pellegrino; Giovanni Assenza; Fioravante Capone; Florinda Ferreri; Domenico Formica; Federico Ranieri; Mario Tombini; Ulf Ziemann; John C Rothwell; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Leon Morales-Quezada; Polyana Vulcano de Toledo Piza; Dian Zeng; Faddi Ghassan Saleh Vélez; Isadora Santos Ferreira; Pedro Henrique Lucena; Dante Duarte; Fernanda Lopes; Mirret M El-Hagrassy; Luiz Vicente Rizzo; Erica C Camargo; David J Lin; Nicole Mazwi; Qing Mei Wang; Randie Black-Schaffer; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 4.  Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Adrian G Guggisberg; Philipp J Koch; Friedhelm C Hummel; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Corticospinal tract integrity correlates with knee extensor weakness in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Sangeetha Madhavan; Chandramouli Krishnan; Arun Jayaraman; William Z Rymer; James W Stinear
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Individual prediction of chronic motor outcome in the acute post-stroke stage: Behavioral parameters versus functional imaging.

Authors:  Anne K Rehme; Lukas J Volz; Delia-Lisa Feis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Combined statistical analysis method assessing fast versus slow movement training in a patient with cerebellar stroke: a single-case study.

Authors:  Huiqiong Deng; Teresa J Kimberley; William K Durfee; Brittany L Dressler; Carie Steil; James R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-01-17

8.  TMS-evoked N100 responses as a prognostic factor in acute stroke.

Authors:  Paolo Manganotti; Michele Acler; Stefano Masiero; Alessandra Del Felice
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 9.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation as an investigative tool for motor dysfunction and recovery in stroke: an overview for neurorehabilitation clinicians.

Authors:  Mar Cortes; Randie M Black-Schaffer; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-05-24

10.  Val66Met BDNF gene polymorphism influences human motor cortex plasticity in acute stroke.

Authors:  Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Giovanni Pellegrino; Giovanni Di Pino; Marzia Corbetto; Federico Ranieri; Nicoletta Brunelli; Matteo Paolucci; Serena Bucossi; Maria C Ventriglia; Peter Brown; Fioravante Capone
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.