Literature DB >> 26381168

Individual prediction of chronic motor outcome in the acute post-stroke stage: Behavioral parameters versus functional imaging.

Anne K Rehme1,2, Lukas J Volz1,3, Delia-Lisa Feis4, Simon B Eickhoff2,5, Gereon R Fink1,2, Christian Grefkes1,2.   

Abstract

Several neurobiological factors have been found to correlate with functional recovery after brain lesions. However, predicting the individual potential of recovery remains difficult. Here we used multivariate support vector machine (SVM) classification to explore the prognostic value of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to predict individual motor outcome at 4-6 months post-stroke. To this end, 21 first-ever stroke patients with hand motor deficits participated in an fMRI hand motor task in the first few days post-stroke. Motor impairment was quantified assessing grip force and the Action Research Arm Test. Linear SVM classifiers were trained to predict good versus poor motor outcome of unseen new patients. We found that fMRI activity acquired in the first week post-stroke correctly predicted the outcome for 86% of all patients. In contrast, the concurrent assessment of motor function provided 76% accuracy with low sensitivity (<60%). Furthermore, the outcome of patients with initially moderate impairment and high outcome variability could not be predicted based on motor tests. In contrast, fMRI provided 87.5% prediction accuracy in these patients. Classifications were driven by activity in ipsilesional motor areas and contralesional cerebellum. The accuracy of subacute fMRI data (two weeks post-stroke), age, time post-stroke, lesion volume, and location were at 50%-chance-level. In conclusion, multivariate decoding of fMRI data with SVM early after stroke enables a robust prediction of motor recovery. The potential for recovery is influenced by the initial dysfunction of the active motor system, particularly in those patients whose outcome cannot be predicted by behavioral tests.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); motor impairment; motor recovery; multivariate pattern classification; support vector machine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26381168      PMCID: PMC4619153          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  52 in total

1.  Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Elaine L Miller; Laura Murray; Lorie Richards; Richard D Zorowitz; Tamilyn Bakas; Patricia Clark; Sandra A Billinger
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Cathy Stinear
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 44.182

3.  Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages.

Authors:  Q McNEMAR
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1947-06       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 4.  Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Janne M Veerbeek; Gert Kwakkel; Erwin E H van Wegen; Johannes C F Ket; Martijn W Heymans
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Dynamic causal modeling of cortical activity from the acute to the chronic stage after stroke.

Authors:  Anne K Rehme; Simon B Eickhoff; Ling E Wang; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The role of the contralesional motor cortex for motor recovery in the early days after stroke assessed with longitudinal FMRI.

Authors:  Anne K Rehme; Gereon R Fink; D Yves von Cramon; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  A link between the systems: functional differentiation and integration within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis.

Authors:  Florian Kurth; Karl Zilles; Peter T Fox; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 8.  Encoding and decoding in fMRI.

Authors:  Thomas Naselaris; Kendrick N Kay; Shinji Nishimoto; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48 h poststroke.

Authors:  Eric Zarahn; Leeor Alon; Sophia L Ryan; Ronald M Lazar; Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Cornelius Weiller; Randolph S Marshall; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study.

Authors:  Rinske H M Nijland; Erwin E H van Wegen; Barbara C Harmeling-van der Wel; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Mapping human brain lesions and their functional consequences.

Authors:  Hans-Otto Karnath; Christoph Sperber; Christopher Rorden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Neuropsychology and cognitive neuroscience in the fMRI era: A recapitulation of localizationist and connectionist views.

Authors:  Matthew J Sutterer; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 3.  Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Adrian G Guggisberg; Philipp J Koch; Friedhelm C Hummel; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  The Prognostic Utility of Electroencephalography in Stroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Amanda A Vatinno; Annie Simpson; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Heather S Bonilha; Leonardo Bonilha; Na Jin Seo
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Rho-Kinase Inhibition Improves the Outcome of Focal Subcortical White Matter Lesions.

Authors:  Sanem A Aykan; Hongyu Xie; Yi Zheng; David Y Chung; Sreekanth Kura; James Han Lai; Taylan D Erdogan; Andreia Morais; Isra Tamim; Damla Yagmur; Hidehiro Ishikawa; Ken Arai; M Abbas Yaseen; David A Boas; Sava Sakadzic; Cenk Ayata
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 10.170

6.  Neuronal Network Topology Indicates Distinct Recovery Processes after Stroke.

Authors:  Shahrzad Latifi; Simon Mitchell; Rouhollah Habibey; Fouzhan Hosseini; Elissa Donzis; Ana María Estrada-Sánchez; H Rezaei Nejad; Michael Levine; Peyman Golshani; S Thomas Carmichael
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Focal Subcortical White Matter Lesions Disrupt Resting State Cortical Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity in Mice.

Authors:  Sanem A Aykan; Hongyu Xie; James Han Lai; Yi Zheng; David Y Chung; Sreekanth Kura; Maryam Anzabi; Kazutaka Sugimoto; Lauren M McAllister; M Abbas Yaseen; David A Boas; Michael J Whalen; Sava Sakadzic; Cenk Ayata
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.861

8.  Interindividual differences in motor network connectivity and behavioral response to iTBS in stroke patients.

Authors:  Svenja Diekhoff-Krebs; Eva-Maria Pool; Anna-Sophia Sarfeld; Anne K Rehme; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-06-04       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Motor Recovery in Subacute Ischemic Stroke: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Assia Jaillard; Marc Hommel; Anaick Moisan; Thomas A Zeffiro; Isabelle M Favre-Wiki; Marianne Barbieux-Guillot; Wilfried Vadot; Sebastien Marcel; Laurent Lamalle; Sylvie Grand; Olivier Detante
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 6.800

10.  Altered Coupling between Motion-Related Activation and Resting-State Brain Activity in the Ipsilesional Sensorimotor Cortex after Cerebral Stroke.

Authors:  Jianping Hu; Juan Du; Qiang Xu; Fang Yang; Fanyong Zeng; Xi-Jian Dai; Xiaoxue Liu; Guangming Lu; Zhiqiang Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.