Literature DB >> 31286828

Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Camila Bonin Pinto1,2,3, Leon Morales-Quezada1,3, Polyana Vulcano de Toledo Piza1,3,4, Dian Zeng1,3, Faddi Ghassan Saleh Vélez1,3,5, Isadora Santos Ferreira1,3, Pedro Henrique Lucena1,3, Dante Duarte1,3, Fernanda Lopes1,3, Mirret M El-Hagrassy1,3, Luiz Vicente Rizzo3, Erica C Camargo1,6, David J Lin1,6, Nicole Mazwi1,3,6, Qing Mei Wang1,6,4,7, Randie Black-Schaffer1,3,6, Felipe Fregni1,3,6.   

Abstract

Background. Although recent evidence has shown a new role of fluoxetine in motor rehabilitation, results are mixed. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with fluoxetine increases upper limb motor function in stroke. Methods. Twenty-seven hemiparetic patients within 2 years of ischemic stroke were randomized into 3 groups: Combined (active rTMS + fluoxetine), Fluoxetine (sham rTMS + fluoxetine), or Placebo (sham rTMS + placebo fluoxetine). Participants received 18 sessions of 1-Hz rTMS in the unaffected primary motor cortex and 90 days of fluoxetine (20 mg/d). Motor function was assessed using Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function (JTHF) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scales. Corticospinal excitability was assessed with TMS. Results. After adjusting for time since stroke, there was significantly greater improvement in JTHF in the combined rTMS + fluoxetine group (mean improvement: -214.33 seconds) than in the placebo (-177.98 seconds, P = 0.005) and fluoxetine (-50.16 seconds, P < 0.001) groups. The fluoxetine group had less improvement than placebo on both scales (respectively, JTHF: -50.16 vs -117.98 seconds, P = 0.038; and FMA: 6.72 vs 15.55 points, P = 0.039), suggesting that fluoxetine possibly had detrimental effects. The unaffected hemisphere showed decreased intracortical inhibition in the combined and fluoxetine groups, and increased intracortical facilitation in the fluoxetine group. This facilitation was negatively correlated with motor function improvement (FMA, r2 = -0.398, P = 0.0395). Conclusion. Combined fluoxetine and rTMS treatment leads to better motor function in stroke than fluoxetine alone and placebo. Moreover, fluoxetine leads to smaller improvements than placebo, and fluoxetine's effects on intracortical facilitation suggest a potential diffuse mechanism that may hinder beneficial plasticity on motor recovery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cortical excitability; fluoxetine; motor recovery; recovery of function; stroke; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31286828      PMCID: PMC6688938          DOI: 10.1177/1545968319860483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  66 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation is initiated early after stroke, but most motor rehabilitation trials are not: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cathy Stinear; Suzanne Ackerley; Winston Byblow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Langhorne; Fiona Coupar; Alex Pollock
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 3.  Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction: can they help us deciphering systemic inflammation and sepsis?

Authors:  Patrick Paulus; Carla Jennewein; Kai Zacharowski
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Fluoxetine and recovery after stroke.

Authors:  H Bart van der Worp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Differential effect of conditioning sequences in coupling inhibitory/facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke motor recovery.

Authors:  Chih-Pin Wang; Po-Yi Tsai; Tsui Fen Yang; Kuang-Yao Yang; Chien-Chih Wang
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.243

6.  Mood induction effects on motor sequence learning and stop signal reaction time.

Authors:  Brian Greeley; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  François Chollet; Jean Tardy; Jean-François Albucher; Claire Thalamas; Emilie Berard; Catherine Lamy; Yannick Bejot; Sandrine Deltour; Assia Jaillard; Philippe Niclot; Benoit Guillon; Thierry Moulin; Philippe Marque; Jérémie Pariente; Catherine Arnaud; Isabelle Loubinoux
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  Efficacy of coupling inhibitory and facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance motor recovery in hemiplegic stroke patients.

Authors:  Wen-Hsu Sung; Chih-Pin Wang; Chen-Liang Chou; Yi-Cheng Chen; Yue-Cune Chang; Po-Yi Tsai
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Effect of serotonin on paired associative stimulation-induced plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Giorgi Batsikadze; Walter Paulus; Min-Fang Kuo; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Serotonin affects transcranial direct current-induced neuroplasticity in humans.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Min-Fang Kuo; Ralf Karrasch; Bettina Wächter; David Liebetanz; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery.

Authors:  Lynn A Legg; Ann-Sofie Rudberg; Xing Hua; Simiao Wu; Maree L Hackett; Russel Tilney; Linnea Lindgren; Mansur A Kutlubaev; Cheng-Fang Hsieh; Amanda J Barugh; Graeme J Hankey; Erik Lundström; Martin Dennis; Gillian E Mead
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-15

2.  Barriers to Enrollment in Post-Stroke Brain Stimulation in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population.

Authors:  Timea Hodics; Leonardo G Cohen; John C Pezzullo; Karen Kowalske; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.895

3.  Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Post-stroke Dysphagia in Acute Stage.

Authors:  Fengjiao Zou; Xiaoxu Chen; Lingchuan Niu; Yule Wang; Jiaquan Chen; Changqing Li; Linyan Tong; Jiani Li
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-10-23       Impact factor: 2.733

4.  Is Fluoxetine Good for Subacute Stroke? A Meta-Analysis Evidenced From Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Guangjie Liu; Xingyu Yang; Tao Xue; Shujun Chen; Xin Wu; Zeya Yan; Zilan Wang; Da Wu; Zhouqing Chen; Zhong Wang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  Safety and Efficacy of SSRIs in Improving Poststroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Heba M Kalbouneh; Ahmad A Toubasi; Farah H Albustanji; Yazan Y Obaid; Layla M Al-Harasis
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.106

6.  Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper-limb and finger function in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Gengbin Chen; Tuo Lin; Manfeng Wu; Guiyuan Cai; Qian Ding; Jiayue Xu; Wanqi Li; Cheng Wu; Hongying Chen; Yue Lan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Test-retest reliability of peak location in the sensorimotor network of resting state fMRI for potential rTMS targets.

Authors:  Yun-Song Hu; Juan Yue; Qiu Ge; Zi-Jian Feng; Jue Wang; Yu-Feng Zang
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.739

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.