BACKGROUND: Gold standards of data analysis for single-case research do not currently exist. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a combined statistical analysis method is more effective in assessing movement training effects in a patient with cerebellar stroke. DESIGN: A crossover single-case research design was conducted. METHODS: The patient was a 69-year-old man with a chronic cerebellar infarct who received two 5-week phases of finger tracking training at different movement rates. Changes were measured with the Box and Block Test, the Jebsen-Taylor test, the finger extension force test, and the corticospinal excitability test. Both visual analysis and statistical tests (including split-middle line method, t test, confidence interval, and effect size) were used to assess potential intervention effects. RESULTS: The results of the t tests were highly consistent with the confidence interval tests, but less consistent with the split-middle line method. Most results produced medium to large effect sizes. LIMITATIONS: The possibility of an incomplete washout effect was a confounding factor in the current analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The combined statistical analysis method may assist researchers in assessing intervention effects in single-case stroke rehabilitation studies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Gold standards of data analysis for single-case research do not currently exist. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a combined statistical analysis method is more effective in assessing movement training effects in a patient with cerebellar stroke. DESIGN: A crossover single-case research design was conducted. METHODS: The patient was a 69-year-old man with a chronic cerebellar infarct who received two 5-week phases of finger tracking training at different movement rates. Changes were measured with the Box and Block Test, the Jebsen-Taylor test, the finger extension force test, and the corticospinal excitability test. Both visual analysis and statistical tests (including split-middle line method, t test, confidence interval, and effect size) were used to assess potential intervention effects. RESULTS: The results of the t tests were highly consistent with the confidence interval tests, but less consistent with the split-middle line method. Most results produced medium to large effect sizes. LIMITATIONS: The possibility of an incomplete washout effect was a confounding factor in the current analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The combined statistical analysis method may assist researchers in assessing intervention effects in single-case stroke rehabilitation studies.
Authors: Christian Grefkes; Dennis A Nowak; Ling E Wang; Manuel Dafotakis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-12-18 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Teresa Jacobson Kimberley; Michael R Borich; Kristina D Prochaska; Shannon L Mundfrom; Ariel E Perkins; Joseph M Poepping Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2009-08-15 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Teresa Jacobson Kimberley; Michael R Borich; Rebekah L Schmidt; James R Carey; Bernadette Gillick Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Teresa J Kimberley; Rebekah L S Schmidt; Mo Chen; Dennis D Dykstra; Cathrin M Buetefisch Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.169