Literature DB >> 25201238

Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation.

Giovanni Di Pino1, Giovanni Pellegrino1, Giovanni Assenza1, Fioravante Capone1, Florinda Ferreri1, Domenico Formica2, Federico Ranieri1, Mario Tombini1, Ulf Ziemann3, John C Rothwell4, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro1.   

Abstract

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques can be used to monitor and modulate the excitability of intracortical neuronal circuits. Long periods of cortical stimulation can produce lasting effects on brain function, paving the way for therapeutic applications of NIBS in chronic neurological disease. The potential of NIBS in stroke rehabilitation has been of particular interest, because stroke is the main cause of permanent disability in industrial nations, and treatment outcomes often fail to meet the expectations of patients. Despite promising reports from many clinical trials on NIBS for stroke recovery, the number of studies reporting a null effect remains a concern. One possible explanation is that the interhemispheric competition model--which posits that suppressing the excitability of the hemisphere not affected by stroke will enhance recovery by reducing interhemispheric inhibition of the stroke hemisphere, and forms the rationale for many studies--is oversimplified or even incorrect. Here, we critically review the proposed mechanisms of synaptic and functional reorganization after stroke, and suggest a bimodal balance-recovery model that links interhemispheric balancing and functional recovery to the structural reserve spared by the lesion. The proposed model could enable NIBS to be tailored to the needs of individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25201238     DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol        ISSN: 1759-4758            Impact factor:   42.937


  174 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review for the early prediction of motor and functional outcome after stroke by using motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Henk T Hendricks; Machiel J Zwarts; Erik F Plat; Jacques van Limbeek
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Electrical stimulation of spared corticospinal axons augments connections with ipsilateral spinal motor circuits after injury.

Authors:  Marcel Brus-Ramer; Jason B Carmel; Samit Chakrabarty; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Friedhelm Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Nagako Murase; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Ipsilateral hemiparesis caused by a corona radiata infarct after a previous stroke on the opposite side.

Authors:  Young-Mok Song; Jee-Young Lee; Jong-Moo Park; Byung-Woo Yoon; Jae-Kyu Roh
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2005-05

5.  Low-frequency rTMS promotes use-dependent motor plasticity in chronic stroke: a randomized trial.

Authors:  A Avenanti; M Coccia; E Ladavas; L Provinciali; M G Ceravolo
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Functional MRI detects posterior shifts in primary sensorimotor cortex activation after stroke: evidence of local adaptive reorganization?

Authors:  R Pineiro; S Pendlebury; H Johansen-Berg; P M Matthews
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in mild to severe hemiparesis early after stroke: a proof of principle and novel approach to improve motor function.

Authors:  Adriana B Conforto; Sarah M Anjos; Gustavo Saposnik; Eduardo A Mello; Erina M Nagaya; Waldyr Santos; Karina N Ferreiro; Eduardo S Melo; Felipe I Reis; Milberto Scaff; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Controversy: Noninvasive and invasive cortical stimulation show efficacy in treating stroke patients.

Authors:  Friedhelm C Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Alvero Pascual-Leone; Felipe Fregni; Winston D Byblow; Cathrin M Buetefisch; John Rothwell; Leonardo G Cohen; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Reducing excessive GABA-mediated tonic inhibition promotes functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Andrew N Clarkson; Ben S Huang; Sarah E Macisaac; Istvan Mody; S Thomas Carmichael
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The myth of the 'unaffected' side after unilateral stroke: is reorganisation of the non-infarcted corticospinal system to re-establish balance the price for recovery?

Authors:  S Graziadio; L Tomasevic; G Assenza; F Tecchio; J A Eyre
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  228 in total

Review 1.  Motor Cortex and Motor Cortical Interhemispheric Communication in Walking After Stroke: The Roles of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Animal Models in Our Current and Future Understanding.

Authors:  Charalambos C Charalambous; Mark G Bowden; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Stratifying chronic stroke patients based on the influence of contralesional motor cortices: An inter-hemispheric inhibition study.

Authors:  Yin-Liang Lin; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Manshi Li; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; John Lee; Stephen Jones; Ken Sakaie; Xiaofeng Wang; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Effective assessments of electroencephalography during stroke recovery: contemporary approaches and considerations.

Authors:  Kartik K Iyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Andre G Machado; Adriana B Conforto; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Nicole M Varnerin; Xiaofeng Wang; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  The effects of five sessions of continuous theta burst stimulation over contralesional sensorimotor cortex paired with paretic skilled motor practice in people with chronic stroke.

Authors:  J L Neva; K E Brown; K P Wadden; C S Mang; M R Borich; S K Meehan; L A Boyd
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Poststroke Impairment and Recovery Are Predicted by Task-Specific Regionalization of Injury.

Authors:  Matthew S Jeffers; Boris Touvykine; Allyson Ripley; Gillian Lahey; Anthony Carter; Numa Dancause; Dale Corbett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Experimental cortical stroke induces aberrant increase of sharp-wave-associated ripples in the hippocampus and disrupts cortico-hippocampal communication.

Authors:  Ji-Wei He; Gratianne Rabiller; Yasuo Nishijima; Yosuke Akamatsu; Karam Khateeb; Azadeh Yazdan-Shahmorad; Jialing Liu
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Personalized upper limb training combined with anodal-tDCS for sensorimotor recovery in spastic hemiparesis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mindy F Levin; Melanie C Baniña; Silvi Frenkel-Toledo; Sigal Berman; Nachum Soroker; John M Solomon; Dario G Liebermann
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Insight into motor control and motor impairment from stroke and beta oscillations.

Authors:  Ramina Adam; Silvia Isabella; Jason L Chan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Clinically Relevant Levels of 4-Aminopyridine Strengthen Physiological Responses in Intact Motor Circuits in Rats, Especially After Pyramidal Tract Injury.

Authors:  Anil Sindhurakar; Asht M Mishra; Disha Gupta; Jennifer F Iaci; Tom J Parry; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.