Literature DB >> 12227625

Modelling the response of scalp sensory receptors to transcranial electrical stimulation.

V Suihko1.   

Abstract

Transcranial electrical stimulation of the brain causes considerable discomfort to the patient. The purpose of the study was to find out whether this could be affected by the choice of stimulation parameters. A spherical volume conductor model of the head and active compartmental models of a pyramidal motor nerve and scalp nociceptor were used in combination to simulate the scalp nociception to transcranial electrical stimulation. Scalp nociceptors were excited at distances of several centimetres from the electrodes. The size of the excited scalp area correlated with the length of the stimulation pulse. The area was 12.3, 20.4 and 26.0 cm2, for a 10 micros, 100 micros and 1 ms constant current pulse, respectively. With a 100 micros constant current pulse, the threshold for motor excitation was 205mA and, for nociception, it was 51 mA. There was no significant difference between constant current and capacitor discharge pulses or between electrodes of different sizes. The results imply that the use of very short stimulation pulses can reduce the pain. If a topical anaesthesia is used to reduce the pain, it has to be applied on a large area around the electrodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12227625     DOI: 10.1007/BF02345071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  26 in total

1.  The influence of an unmyelinated terminal on repetitive firing of a mammalian receptor afferent fiber.

Authors:  F Awiszus
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 2.  Surgical monitoring of motor pathways.

Authors:  D Burke; R G Hicks
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 3.  Functional morphology of nociceptive and other fine sensory endings (free nerve endings) in different tissues.

Authors:  K Messlinger
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  "Threshold-level" multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  B Calancie; W Harris; J G Broton; N Alexeeva; B A Green
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  A model of the electrical behaviour of myelinated sensory nerve fibres based on human data.

Authors:  W A Wesselink; J Holsheimer; H B Boom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  EEG electrode sensitivity--an application of reciprocity.

Authors:  S Rush; D A Driscoll
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Which structures are sensitive to painful transcranial electric stimulation?

Authors:  V Häkkinen; H Eskola; A Yli-Hankala; T Nurmikko; S Kolehmainen
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-10

8.  The diagnostic value of motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; P Profice; L Ferrara; E Saturno; F Pilato; P Tonali
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  Uniformity of current density under stimulating electrodes.

Authors:  Y Kim; H G Zieber; F E Wang
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1990

10.  Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia.

Authors:  U Pechstein; C Cedzich; J Nadstawek; J Schramm
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  3 in total

1.  Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Zhi-De Deng; Tae-Seong Kim; Andrew F Laine; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Electroconvulsive therapy stimulus parameters: rethinking dosage.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Moacyr A Rosa; Zhi-De Deng; Joan Prudic; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.635

3.  Pulse Width Affects Scalp Sensation of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Bruce Luber; Gregory G Westin; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 8.955

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.