Literature DB >> 9681557

Surgical monitoring of motor pathways.

D Burke1, R G Hicks.   

Abstract

Intraoperative monitoring of corticospinal function is no longer an experimental technique, having been introduced into routine practice in a number of centers, each of which has now accumulated large series of some hundreds of cases. Different techniques have been developed by these centers; each has advantages and disadvantages, and it is clear that no one technique in particular is optimal for all surgical procedures. The corticospinal system can be activated by transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex or by direct stimulation of the spinal cord with electrical or magnetic stimuli delivered singly or as double or multiple pulses. The evoked activity may be recorded directly from the spinal cord using epidural electrode, or as a postsynaptic volley in motor axons ("neurogenic motor evoked potentials," MEP), or as a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from innervated muscles. For scoliosis surgery, we use transcranial electrical stimulation, recording the evoked volley from the spinal cord using epidural electrodes at two spinal levels. By simultaneously stimulating the tibial nerves in the popliteal fossae, descending corticospinal volleys and ascending somatosensory volleys can be recorded in the same sweep. Accordingly, this technique allows monitoring of two different modalities of function at two separate levels of the nervous system, a goal that is most desirable because it helps identify the earliest evidence of dysfunction and at the same time minimizes false-positive reports to the surgeon. Our technique has the advantage of being relatively immune to the depressant effects of anesthesia, and full muscle relaxation is possible--even desirable. More peripheral recordings of neurogenic MEP or CMAP, are sensitive to the choice of anesthetic, and the latter requires incomplete curarization. However, these techniques may be appropriate when the pathology is in the low spinal cord or nerve roots.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9681557     DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199805000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  7 in total

1.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during complex spinal deformity cases in pediatric patients: methodology, utility, prognostication, and outcome.

Authors:  James Drake; Reinhard Zeller; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Samuel Strantzas; Laura Holmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Does transcranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) worsen seizures in epileptic patients following spinal deformity surgery?

Authors:  Khalid M I Salem; Laura Goodger; Katherine Bowyer; Masood Shafafy; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Optimizing the extent of resection in eloquently located gliomas by combining intraoperative MRI guidance with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Christian Senft; Marie-Thérèse Forster; Andrea Bink; Michel Mittelbronn; Kea Franz; Volker Seifert; Andrea Szelényi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Modelling the response of scalp sensory receptors to transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  V Suihko
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon.

Authors:  Thomas N Pajewski; Vincent Arlet; Lawrence H Phillips
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Sensitivity and specificity in transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring during neurosurgical operations.

Authors:  Satoshi Tanaka; Takashi Tashiro; Akira Gomi; Junko Takanashi; Hiroshi Ujiie
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-08-13

7.  Intraoperative monitoring study of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials in scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Y L Lo; Y F Dan; Y E Tan; S Fook-Chong; S B Tan; C T Tan; S Raman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.