Literature DB >> 12199311

The ideal free distribution in humans: an experimental test.

M B Sokolowski1, F Tonneau, E Freixa i Baqué.   

Abstract

How the distribution of resources affects the spatial distribution of animals is a central concern of behavioral ecology. One influential model relating population dynamics to individual foraging behavior is that of ideal free distribution (Fretwell & Lucas, 1970). This model assumes foragers of equal competitive abilities, moving freely from one habitat to another, the choices made by each individual subject are supposed to equalize gains across habitats. The resulting distribution at the group level, or ideal free distribution, has been tested with various animal species. Here we report an experimental test with human subjects competing for money. The results approximate those predicted by the ideal free model, the degree of approximation being consistent with that obtained in other species. This similarity of results supports the application of behavioral ecology models to humanperformance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12199311     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  7 in total

1.  Melioration, matching, and maximization.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Foraging wood-ants Formica aquilonia yarrow (hymenoptera: formicidae) tend to adopt the ideal free distribution.

Authors:  A E Lamb; J G Ollason
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control.

Authors:  M P Hassell; G C Varley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Optimization: a result or a mechanism?

Authors:  J E Staddon; J M Hinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Optimization theory fails to predict performance of pigeons in a two-response situation.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Learning the evolutionarily stable strategy.

Authors:  C B Harley
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1981-04-21       Impact factor: 2.691

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  A half century of scalloping in the work habits of the United States Congress.

Authors:  Thomas S Critchfield; Rebecca Haley; Benjamin Sabo; Jorie Colbert; Georgette Macropoulis
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  Group foraging sensitivity to predictable and unpredictable changes in food distribution: past experience or present circumstances?

Authors:  Kenneth E Bell; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The matching relation and situation-specific bias modulation in professional football play selection.

Authors:  Stephanie T Stilling; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Group choice: the ideal free distribution of human social behavior.

Authors:  J R Kraft; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Knowledge of resources and competitors in human foraging.

Authors:  Robert L Goldstone; Benjamin C Ashpole; Michael E Roberts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

6.  Human group choice: discrete-trial and free-operant tests of the ideal free distribution.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Blaine F Peden; Tetsuo Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Human foraging behavior in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Robert L Goldstone; Benjamin C Ashpole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

8.  Human risky choice under temporal constraints: tests of an energy-budget model.

Authors:  Cynthia J Pietras; Matthew L Locey; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.