Literature DB >> 7292017

Optimization theory fails to predict performance of pigeons in a two-response situation.

J E Mazur.   

Abstract

Optimization theory states that organisms behave in a way that maximizes reinforcement or "value." In a two-response situation, pigeons' response proportions approximately equaled reinforcement proportions, even when this behavior pattern substantially decreased the rate of reinforcement. Optimization or reinforcement maximization was not supported as the basic mechanism underlying choice behavior.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7292017     DOI: 10.1126/science.7292017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  21 in total

1.  When we speak of integrating..

Authors:  T D Hackenberg
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1987

2.  Are birds smarter than mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) perform optimally on a version of the Monty Hall Dilemma.

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson; Julia Schroeder
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Molecular maximizing characterizes choice on Vaughan's (1981) procedure.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J M Ziriax
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice: A local analysis.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Inelastic supply: An economic approach to simple interval schedules.

Authors:  J D Dougan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  How to teach a pigeon to maximize overall reinforcement rate.

Authors:  G M Heyman; L Tanz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice in transition: A comparison of melioration and the kinetic model.

Authors:  J Myerson; S Hale
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Commentary prompted by Vaughan's Reply to Silberberg and Ziriax by Alan Silberberg and John M. Ziriax, and by William Timberlake, with concluding remarks by William Vaughan, Jr.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J M Ziriax; W Timberlake; W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Melloration and maximization of reinforcement minus costs of behavior.

Authors:  H Boelens
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.

Authors:  W W Fisher; R H Thompson; C C Piazza; K Crosland; D Gotjen
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.